Content analysis of witness testimony − between cognitive linguistics and forensic psychology

Katarzyna Liber

Uniwersytet Jagielloński


Abstract

This article attempts to investigate the legitimacy of including the linguistic perspective to the content analysis of witness testimony, which at the present time is being primarily developed in the area of forensic psychology. If we consider that at least part of the nineteen CBCA criteria included in the Statement Validity Assessment method seems to be rather inaccurate and ineffective, it cannot be treated as a credible and objective tool to be applied in the Polish forensic practice.

The article presents the former achievements of linguists in creating criteria for testimony content analysis and their definitions to possibly be applied in practice. It also presents the results of a diagnostic accuracy survey carried out on a Polish language material on the currently existing linguistic criteria and author’s new proposals.


Keywords:

testimony credibility assessment, testimony content analysis, Criteria- -Based Content Analysis, linguistic criteria, testimony credibilty assessment, testimony content analysis, Criteria-Based Content Analysis, linguistic criteria

Antas J. (2008): O kłamstwie i kłamaniu. Kraków.   Google Scholar

Arciuli J., Mallard D., Villar G. (2010): “Um, I can tell you’re lying”: Linguistic markers of deception versus truth-telling in speech. „Applied Psycholinguistics” 31, s. 397–411.   Google Scholar

Buchard M. (2009): Ocena wiarygodności dowodu z przesłuchania poznawczego w procesie karnym. „Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis” nr 3128, s. 175–180.   Google Scholar

Choudchury F. (2014): Can language be useful in detecting deception? The linguistic markers of deception in the Jodi Arias interview. „Journal of Undergraduate Research”. Vol. 7 Issue 2, s. 78–92.   Google Scholar

DePaulo B. M, Lindsay J. L., Malone B. E., Muhlenbruck B. E., Charlton K., Cooper H. (2003): Cues to deception. „Psychological Bulletin”, 129, s. 74–118.   Google Scholar

Hauch V., Blandon-Gitlin I., Masip J., Sporer S. L. (2014): Are computers effective lie detectors? Meta-analysis of linguistic cues to deception. „Personality and Social Psychology Review” 1, s. 1–36.   Google Scholar

Ludwin I.: Świadek w procesie karnym. (URL , dostęp: 15.02.2017.   Google Scholar

Malska W. (2017): Wybrane statystyki nieparametryczne. „Edukacja – Technika – Informatyka“ nr 2(20), s. 111–117.   Google Scholar

Newman M. L., Pennebaker J.W., Berry D. S., Richards J. M. (2003): Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. „Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin” 29(5), s. 666–675.   Google Scholar

Pieszko-Sroka A. (2011): Czy zeznania są wiarygodne? Poszukiwanie metody ich oceny i rola psychologa w tym procesie. „Przegląd Bezpieczeństwa Wewnętrznego” nr 5, s. 44–54.   Google Scholar

Tabakowska E. (1995): Gramatyka i obrazowanie: wprowadzenie do językoznawstwa kognitywnego. Kraków.   Google Scholar

Vrij A. (2009), Wykrywanie kłamstw i oszukiwania. Psychologia kłamania i konsekwencje dla praktyki zawodowej. Kraków.   Google Scholar

Vrij A., Edward K., Roberts K. P., Bull R. (2000): Detecting Deceit via Analysis of verbal and Nonverbal Behavior. „Journal of Nonverbal Behavior” 24, s. 239–264.   Google Scholar

Wojciechowski B. W. (2016): Analiza i ocena zeznań świadków. Sopot.   Google Scholar

Zuckerman M., DePaulo B. M., Rosenthal R. (1981): Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. [W:] L. Berkowitz (red.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14). Nowy Jork, s. 1–59.   Google Scholar


Published
2019-04-12

Cited by

Liber, K. (2019). Content analysis of witness testimony − between cognitive linguistics and forensic psychology. Papers in Linguistics, 21(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.31648/pj.3706

Katarzyna Liber 
Uniwersytet Jagielloński



License

Copyright (c) 2019 Prace Językoznawcze

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Access to the electronic edition of the journal is open (open access). It does not require any fees, logging in or providing personal data. Every person, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnic origin, nationality, faith or political opinion, may read articles published in "Prace Językoznawcze", download versions of texts in PDF file format, identical to the printed version, and submit for publication texts of their authorship, concerning linguistic issues and meeting editorial substantive and editorial requirements and academic ethical standards binding in science.

Authors of texts may place PDF files with their texts or the entire issue of a journal on scientific Internet portals, indicating the source of the text. The number of PDF files to be used is unlimited. It is forbidden to use the texts commercially or to derive material benefits from them. The Editorial Board has the right to publish the received texts in printed and electronic editions and to disseminate their entirety as well as abstracts and keywords on the website of the journal, the publishing platform of the University of Warmia and Mazury, in printed editions and in Internet scientific databases.