Mechanisms of syntactic control in the Minimalist Program – Movement Theory of Control
Jarosław Aptacy
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w PoznaniuAbstract
The article attempts to show that in line with the Minimalist Program, which is characterized
by significant methodological and derivational reductionism, it is possible to
abandon PRO as the phonetically empty subject of the infinitive clause. In its place, it is
proposed to interpret the relation between PRO and its coreferential phrase (“controller”)
as an argument movement. PRO may therefore be interpreted as an identical copy of the
NP, which determines its semantic interpretation. This approach simplifies modelling
grammar because an argument movement appears in grammars independently of control.
The first part of the article describes the most important phenomena related to syntactic
control from the general linguistic perspective, and then, using the example of Polish,
some derivations of typical structures with object and subject control are presented. Also,
possible problems that the Movement Theory of Control might face are pointed out.
Keywords:
syntactic control, infinitive, Movement Theory of Control, derivationReferences
Aptacy J. (2013): Zu Kontrolltypen aus kontrastiver Sicht: eine deutsch-polnische Studie. „Studia Linguistica“ XXXII, s. 19–32. Google Scholar
Aptacy J. (2019): Ausgewählte Aspekte der Infinitivkomplementierung aus sprachvergleichender Sicht. Eine minimalistische Studie. Poznań.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Bańko M. (red.) (2000): Inny słownik języka polskiego. Warszawa. Google Scholar
Boeckx C. (2006): Linguistic Minimalism. Origins, Concepts, Methods, and Aims. Oxford.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Boeckx C., Hornstein N. (2004): Movement under Control. „Linguistic Inquiry” XXXV, s. 431–452.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Boeckx C., Hornstein N., Nunes J. (2010): Control as Movement. Cambridge.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Bondaruk A. (2004): PRO and Control in English, Irish and Polish – A Minimalist Analysis. Lublin. Google Scholar
Chomsky N. (1982): Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht. Google Scholar
Corver N., Nunes J. (2007): The Copy Theory of Movement. Amsterdam–Philadelphia.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Courtenay K. (1998): Summary: Subject control verb PROMISE in English. Online: http://linguistlist.org/issues/9/9-651.htmlhttp://linguistlist.org/issues/9/9-651.html. Google Scholar
Davies W.D., Dubinsky S. (2004): The Grammar of Raising and Control. A Course in Syntactic Argumentation. Malden, MA etc.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Drummond A., Hornstein N. (2014): Some Purported Problems for the Movement Theory of Control. „Linguistic Inquiry“ XLV, s. 449–462.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Fanselow G. (2001): Features, Theta-Roles and Free Constituent Order. „Linguistic Inquiry” XXXII, s. 405–437.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Grewendorf G. (2002): Minimalistische Syntax. Tübingen–Basel. Google Scholar
Grochowski M. (1984): Składnia wyrażeń polipredykatywnych. [W:] Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego. Składnia. Red. Z. Topolińska. Warszawa, s. 213–299. Google Scholar
Hornstein N. (1998): Movement and Chains. „Syntax“ I, s. 99–127.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Hornstein N. (1999): Movement and Control. „Linguistic Inquiry” XXX, s. 69–96.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Hornstein N. (2001): Move! A minimalist Theory of Construal. Malden MA–Oxford. Google Scholar
Hornstein N. (2003): On Control. [W:] Minimalist syntax. Red. H. Randall. Malden MA etc., s. 6–81.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Hornstein N., Nunes J., Grohmann K.K. (2005): Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Koster J. (1984): On binding and control. „Linguistic Inquiry” XV, s. 417–459. Google Scholar
Landau I. (2000): Elements of Control. Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions. Dordrecht etc. Google Scholar
Lipczuk R., Mecner P., Westphal W. (2000): Lexikon der modernen Linguistik. Leksykon lingwistyki współczesnej. Szczecin. Google Scholar
Mecner P. (2005): Elementy gramatyki umysłu. Od struktur składniowych do minimalizmu. Kraków. Google Scholar
Ndayiragije J. (2012): On Raising out of Control. „Linguistic Inquiry” XLIII, s. 275–299.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Polański K. (red.) (1984): Słownik syntaktyczno-generatywny czasowników polskich. Wrocław. Google Scholar
Polinsky M., Potsdam E. (2006): Expanding the scope of control and raising. „Syntax” XIX, s. 171–192.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Rosenbaum P. (1967): The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. Cambridge. Google Scholar
Słodowicz S. (2006): Control in Polish Complement Clauses. München. Google Scholar
Topolińska Z. (1984): Składnia grupy imiennej. [W:] Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego. Składnia. Red. Z. Topolińska. Warszawa, s. 301–389. Google Scholar
Williams E. (1980): Predication. „Linguistic Inquiry” XI, s. 203–238. Google Scholar
Witkoś J. (2010): Movement Theory of Control and CP-Infinitives in Polish. [W:] Movement Theory of Control. Red. N. Hornstein, M. Polinsky. Amsterdam–Philadelphia, s. 45–65.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Witkoś J. (2013): Minimality in Polish Control: Late Merge and Smuggling. [W:] Formal Description of Slavic Languages: the Ninth Conference. Proceedings of FDSL 9, Göttingen 2011. Red. U. Junghanns et al. Frankfurt am Main, s. 349–375. Google Scholar
Witkoś J., Cegłowski P., Snarska A., Żychliński S. (2011): Wybrane aspekty derywacji i interpretacji wyrażeń bezokolicznikowych. Minimalistyczne studium porównawcze polsko-angielskie. Poznań. Google Scholar
Zaron Z. (1980): Ze studiów nad składnią i semantyką czasownika. Polskie czasowniki z uzupełnieniem werbalnym oznaczające relację osobową z argumentem zdarzeniowym. Wrocław etc. Google Scholar
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.