Problems of revival and development of animal husbandry in Ukraine
Проблемы возрождения и развития отрасли животноводства в Украине
Alexandr Lavruk
Akademia Zarządzania Personelem w Kijowiehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7932-0036
Vitalii Lavruk
Podilsky Technical University of Agrarian Sciencehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0778-7227
Abstract
The problem of revival is considered and the current state of development of animal husbandry in Ukraine is investigated. The research is based on the use of state information resources and generalization of scientific developments of domestic and foreign scientists. The changes in the number of farm animals, the volume of livestock production and improving its economic efficiency are analyzed. It is established that the process of revival should be accompanied by the effective use of own financial resources and ensure the sustainable development of all sub-sectors of animal husbandry. To ensure the implementation of effective measures for the revival, stabilization and development of animal husbandry is possible through the effective use of all types of production resources, in particular the genetic potential of animals, the introduction of innovative technologies and economic levers that contribute to the profitability of animal husbandry. The main factors that directly affect the potential of livestock and poultry and increase its productivity are identified. The necessity of creation of the state special fund for revival and support of animal husbandry is specified and the directions of increase of its effective development are offered.
Keywords:
animal husbandry revival, production effective development farm animals production taxationReferences
FAO (2018), FAO: mirovoy rynok myasa trevozhit. URL: http://www.proagro.com.ua/periodical/basic/as334/7357.html. [ФАО (2018), ФАО: мировой рынок мяса тревожит. URL: http://www.proagro.com.ua/periodical/basic/as334/7357.html.]
Food and Agriculture Organization (2002), Organic Аgriculture, Environment and Food Security. Rome.
Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba stataistiki Ukrainy (2017), Selskoe khozyaistvo Ukrainy. Kilev. [Государственная служба статистики Украины (2017), Сельское хозяйство Украины. Киев.]
Gosudarstvennaya sluzhbastatistiki Ukrainy (2017), Balansy i potrebleniya osnovnykh produktov pitaniya naseleniem Ukrainy. Kiev. [Государственная служба статистики Украины (2017),
Балансы и потребления основных продуктов питания населением Украины. Киев.]
Keynes, J. (1999), Obshchaya teoriya zanyatosti, procenta i deneg. Kiev. [Кейнс, Дж. М. (1999), Общая теория занятости, процента и денег. Москва.]
Lyons, R. K./Machen, R. V. (2001), Stocking rate: The key grazing management decision. Texas Agricultural Extension Service, L-5400. URL: http://rangeweb.tamu.edu/extension/rangedetect/index.htm.
Palei, T. (2015), Assessing the Impact of Infrastructure on Economic Growth and Global Competitiveness. B: Procedia Economics and Finance. 23, 168-175.
Parr, T. W./Sier, A. R./Battarbee, R. W. et al. (2003), Detecting environmental change: science and society-perspectives on long-term research and monitoring in the 21st century. B: Sci Total Environ. 310/1–3, 1–8.
Sakhac’kiy, M. P. (2000), Problemy vidrozhennya sil’skoho hospodarstwa. Kyiv. [Сахацький, М. П. (2000), Проблеми відродження сільського господарства. Київ.]
Sel’skoe khozyaistvo SShA (2018), URL: http://geoknigi.com/view_country.php?Id=100. [Сельское хозяйство США (2018), URL: http://geoknigi.com/view_country.php?Id=100.]
Stepanyuk, A. (2012), Zhivotnovodstvo v Ukraine – vozrozhdenie ili upadok? V: Agrobiznes segonya. 11, 40–43. [Степанюк, А. (2012), Животноводство в Украине – возрождение или упадок? В: Агробизнес сегодня. 11, 40–43.]
Strategicheskie napravleniya (2012), Strategicheskie napravleniya razvitiya selskogo khozyaistva Ukrainy v period do 2020 goda. Kiev. [Стратегические направления (2012), Стратегические направления развития сельского хозяйства Украины на период до 2020 года. Киев.]
Tilman, D./Fargione, J. et al. (2001), Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. In: Science. 292, 281–284.
Podilsky Technical University of Agrarian Science
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0778-7227
Similar Articles
- Bibigul Almurzayeva, Danna Summers, Yelizaveta Davletkaliyeva, Psychological aspects of motivation and job satisfaction of faculty members: the case of one state University in Kazakhstan , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 9 No. 2 (2018): East European Review
- Zbigniew Klimiuk, Economic and trade relations between the USSR and Germany in the period of 1918–1940 (part 1) , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 9 No. 1 (2018): East European Review
- Daniya Zagidullina, Tatar literature at the turn of the XX–XXI centuries: transformation of realism , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 9 No. 1 (2018): East European Review
- Grzegorz Pełczyński, Baptists and Evangelical Christians in 1920s of the 20th century , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 8 No. 2 (2017): East European Review
- Marina Muravieva, State support of the village social infrastructure systems , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 8 No. 2 (2017): East European Review
- Bibigul Almurzayeva, Orynkul Shunkeeva, Altanai Zhaltapova, Contemporary forms of education assessment in organizations of Kazakhstan , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 8 No. 2 (2017): East European Review
- Natalia Tomczewska-Popowycz, Ethnic tourism and other similar forms of tourism in literature of Eastern Europe , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 8 No. 1 (2017): East European Review
- Igor Grebenkin, Armia czasów wojny w procesie politycznym w Rosji w 1917 roku , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 10 No. 1 (2019): East European Review
- Izabela Lewandowska, Gracjan Giżejewski, Oral history w Rosji i Polsce – próba porównania , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 10 No. 1 (2019): East European Review
- Zbigniew Klimiuk, Economic and trade relations between the USSR and Germany in the period of 1918–1940 (part 2) , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 9 No. 2 (2018): East European Review
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
