The measurement, structure, and cross-cultural equivalence of political party perception. Evidence from Poland, Lithuania, and Ukraine

AAKER, J. L. (1997), Dimensions of brand personality. In: Journal of Marketing Research. 34 (3), 347-356.
Crossref   Google Scholar

BLAIS, A./NADEAU, R./GIDENGIL, E. et al. (2001), The formation of party preferences: Testing the proximity and directional models. In: European Journal of Political Research. 40 (1), 81-91.
Crossref   Google Scholar

BRADER, T. (2005), Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. In: American Journal of Political Science. 49 (2), 388-405.
Crossref   Google Scholar

CLARK, T. D. (1994), The Lithuanian political party system: A case study of democratic consolidation. In: East European Politics and Societies 9 (1), 41-62.
Crossref   Google Scholar

CWALINA, W./FALKOWSKI, A./KAID, L. L. (2000), Role of advertising in forming the image of politicians: Comparative analysis of Poland, France, and Germany. In: Media Psychology. 2 (2), 119-146.
Crossref   Google Scholar

D’ANIERI, P. (2011), Structural constraints in Ukrainian politics. In: East European Politics and Societies. 25 (1), 28-46.
Crossref   Google Scholar

DAHLBERG, S. (2009), Political parties and perceptual agreement: The influence of party related factors on voters’ perceptions in proportional electoral systems. In: Electoral Studies. 28 (2), 270-278.
Crossref   Google Scholar

DALTON, R. J./WELDON, S. A. (2005), Public images of political parties: A necessary evil? In: West European Politics. 28 (5), 931-951.
Crossref   Google Scholar

DAMASIO, A. (1994), Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York.   Google Scholar

DOWNS, A. (1957), An economic theory of democracy. New York.   Google Scholar

GOLDBERG, L. R. (1981), Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In: Review of Personality and Social Psychology. 2 (1), 141-165.   Google Scholar

GOPAL, K./VERMA, R. (2018), Brand personality in politics: Scale development and validation. In: Indian Journal of Marketing. 48 (2), 36-51.
Crossref   Google Scholar

GORBANIUK, O./KUSAK, K./KOGUT, A.et al. (2015), Dimensions of political party “personality” perception. In: Journal of Political Marketing. 14, 35-63.
Crossref   Google Scholar

HAYES, D. (2005), Candidate qualities through a partisan lens: A theory of trait ownership. In: American Journal of Political Science. 49 (4), 908-923.
Crossref   Google Scholar

INGLEHART, R./BAKER, W. E. (2000), Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. In: American Sociological Review. 65 (1), 19-51.
Crossref   Google Scholar

KOLAŃSKA, M./GORBANIUK, O./WILCZEWSKI, M. (2020), From exploratory research to structural models: A multilevel lexical approach. In: Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski (East European Review). 11 (2), 131-143.
Crossref   Google Scholar

KUSTOS, M. (2011), Dyspozycyjne a społeczne aspekty wizerunku partii politycznych (‘Dispositional vs. social aspects of the political party image’). Lublin.   Google Scholar

MATTES, K./MILAZZO, C. (2014), Pretty faces, marginal races: Predicting election outcomes using trait assessments of British parliamentary candidates. In: Electoral Studies. 34, 177-189.
Crossref   Google Scholar

MERKEL, W. (2009), Plausible theory, unexpected results: The rapid democratic consolidation in Central and Eastern Europe. In: Bakke, E./Peters, I. (eds.), 20 Years since the fall of the Berlin Wall. Transitions, state break-up and democratic politics in Central Europe and Germany. Berlin, 57-76   Google Scholar

RUTTER, R. N./HANRETTY, C./LETTICE, F. (2018), Political brands: Can parties be distinguished by their online brand personality? In: Journal of Political Marketing. 17 (3), 193-212.
Crossref   Google Scholar

SAUCIER, G./SRIVASTAVA, S. (2015), What makes a good structural model of personality? Evaluating the big five and alternatives. In: Mikulincer, M./Shaver, P. R./Cooper, M. L./Larsen, R. J. (eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 4: Personality processes and individual differences. Washington, DC, 283-305
Crossref   Google Scholar

SCARROW, S. E./WEBB, P. D. (2017), Investigating party organization: Structures, resources, and representative strategies. In: Scarrow, S. E./Webb, P. D./Poguntke, T. (eds.), Organizing political parties. Oxford, 1-27.
Crossref   Google Scholar

SCHMITT, N. (1996), Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. In: Psychological Assessment. 8 (4), 350-353.
Crossref   Google Scholar

SCHNEIDER, H. (2004), Branding in politics - Manifestations, relevance and identity-oriented management. In: Journal of Political Marketing. 3 (3), 41-67.
Crossref   Google Scholar

SEARS, D. O. (2001), The role of affect in symbolic politics. In: Kuklinski, J. K. (ed.), Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology. Cambridge, 14-40.
Crossref   Google Scholar

SMITH, G. (2001), The 2001 general election: Factors influencing the brand image of political parties and their leaders. In: Journal of Marketing Management. 17 (9-10), 989-1006.
Crossref   Google Scholar

SMITH, G. (2005), Politically significant events and their effect on the image of political parties. In: Journal of Political Marketing. 4 (2-3), 91-114.
Crossref   Google Scholar

SMITH, G. (2009), Conceptualizing and testing brand personality in British politics. In: Journal of Political Marketing. 8 (3), 209-232.
Crossref   Google Scholar

SPEED, R./Butler, P./Collins, N. (2015), Human branding in political marketing: Applying contemporary branding thought to political parties and their leaders. In: Journal of Political Marketing. 14, 129-151.
Crossref   Google Scholar

STOKES, D. E. (1963), Spatial models of party competition. In: American Political Science Review. 57 (2), 368-377.
Crossref   Google Scholar

TAJFEL, H. (1981), Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge.   Google Scholar