Polskie, europejskie i amerykańskie standardy korzystania z AI przez prawników – porównanie wybranych obowiązków etycznych

Abbasi Z., Responsible legal augmentation: integrating generative AI into legal practice, „Law, Technology and Humans” 2025, t. 7, nr 3.   Google Scholar

American Bar Association, Formal opinion 512: generative artificial intelligence tools, Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility, https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/professional_responsibility/ethics-opinions/aba-formal-opinion-512.pdf.   Google Scholar

American Bar Association, Model rules of professional conduct, https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/.   Google Scholar

Borelli M., Kerrigan C., Mush S., The EU AI Act: a comprehensive regulatory framework for ethical ai development, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4549248.   Google Scholar

Browning J.G., Robot lawyers don’t have disciplinary hearings – real lawyers do: the ethical risks and responses in using generative artificial intelligence, „Georgia State University Law Review” 2024, t. 40, nr 4, https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr/vol40/iss4/9.   Google Scholar

Conley A., Understanding the duty of competence for attorneys using generative AI, „North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology” 2025, t. 27, nr 1.   Google Scholar

Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe, Charter of core principles of the European legal profession and code of conduct for European lawyers, https://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/DEONTOLOGY/DEON_CoC/EN_DEONTO_2021_Model_Code.pdf.   Google Scholar

Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe, CCBE considerations on the legal aspects of artificial intelligence, https://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/IT_LAW/ITL_Guides_recommendations/EN_ITL_20200220_CCBE-considerations-on-the-Legal-Aspects-of-AI.pdf.   Google Scholar

Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe, CCBE guide on the use of generative AI by lawyers, https://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/IT_LAW/ITL_Guides_recommendations/EN_ITL_20251002_CCBE-guide-on-the-use-of-the-use-of-generative-AI-for-lawyers.pdf.   Google Scholar

Eliot L.B., American Bar Association lowers the boom and lays down the law on lawyers’ proper use of generative AI, https://www.forbes.com/sites/lanceeliot/2024/07/31/american-bar-association-lowers-the-boom-and-lays-down-the-law-on-lawyers-proper-use-of-generative-ai/.   Google Scholar

Frostestad H.L., Technologically competent reprised: ethical practice in an AI age and considerations for our courts in a burgeoning AI era, „Belmont Law Review” 2025, t. 12.   Google Scholar

Garon J.M., Ethics 3.0 – attorney responsibility in the age of generative AI, „The Business Lawyer” 2023/2024, t. 79, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4746102.   Google Scholar

Horrigan D., Generative AI: a legal ethics roadmap and reference guide, https://www.law.com/legaltechnews/2024/08/11/generative-ai-a-legal-ethics-roadmap-and-reference-guide/?slreturn=20260426091702.   Google Scholar

Kaczmarczyk M., Quo vadis, sztuczna inteligencjo? Rozważania nad problematyką etyczną i prawną AI, „Studia Prawnoustrojowe” 2025, nr 68.   Google Scholar

Krajowa Izba Radców Prawnych, Rekomendacje dotyczące korzystania przez radców prawnych z narzędzi opartych na sztucznej inteligencji, KIRP, Warszawa 2025.   Google Scholar

Lawson J., Artificial intelligence, ABA formal opinion 512 and access to justice, https://www.llrx.com/2024/12/artificial-intelligence-aba-formal-opinion-512-and-access-to-justice/?.   Google Scholar

Magesh V., Surani F., Dahl M., Suzgun M., Manning C.D., Ho D.E., Hallucination-free? Assessing the reliability of leading AI legal research tools, „Journal of Empirical Legal Studies” 2025, nr 22(2).   Google Scholar

Mielniczek P., Etyka pracy prawnika z wykorzystaniem sztucznej inteligencji, „Prawo Nowych Technologii” 2025, nr 1.   Google Scholar

Niemczuk A., Zienkiewicz A., Artificial intelligence in the work of lawyers and in the judicial system – from new technologies to regulations, „Studia Prawnoustrojowe” 2025, nr 68.   Google Scholar

Pierce N.A., Goutos S.L., Why lawyers must responsibly embrace generative AI, SSRN, 2023, wersja zaktualizowana 2024, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4477704.   Google Scholar

Piesiewicz P.F., Zasady korzystania z generatywnej sztucznej inteligencji w międzynarodowych i zagranicznych dokumentach dotyczących wykonywania zawodu adwokata. Wnioski dla Adwokatury Polskiej, „Palestra” 2026, nr 5.   Google Scholar

Piesiewicz P.F., Wojdyło K., Wpływ narzędzi sztucznej inteligencji na samodzielność osądu adwokata. Wyzwania etyczne i poznawcze związane z automatyzacją czynności zawodowych, „Palestra” 2026, nr 4.   Google Scholar

Strong S.I., Artificial intelligence in civil justice systems: an empirical and interdisciplinary analysis and proposal for moving forward, Emory Legal Studies Research Paper, „Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution” 2026, vol. 41, https://ssrn.com/abstract=5239069.   Google Scholar

Terzidou K., Generative AI systems in legal practice offering quality legal services while upholding legal ethics, „International Journal of Law in Context” 2025, t. 21.   Google Scholar

The European Bars Federation, New Technologies Commision, European lawyers in the era of ChatGPT. Guidelines 2.0, wrzesień 2024.   Google Scholar

Walters E., The model rules of autonomous conduct: ethical responsibilities of lawyers and artificial intelligence, „Georgia State University Law Review” 2019, nr 35(4), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3375045.   Google Scholar

Webb J., Generative artificial intelligence in legal practice: epistemic expertise, unethical AI, and the role of virtue, „Minds and Machines” 2026, t. 36, art. nr 19, DOI: 10.1007/s11023-026-09771-2.   Google Scholar