ЗНАЧЕНИЕ И КОММУНИКАЦИЯ КАК ЛИНЕВИСТИЧЕСКАЯ ПРОБЛЕМА И КОРНИ ЕЕ НЕПОНИМАНИЯ

Александр Кравченко

Байкальский государственный университет экономики и права



Abstrakt

Arguments are given for a necessity to abandon the code model and “container” metaphor in the study of linguistic meaning and communication; as they do not take into account the true nature of meaning and communication, these methodological premises of conventional linguistics are empirically inadequate and impede its further development.


Słowa kluczowe:

written language bias, code model, “Container” metaphor, orientational effect, reci- procal causality


Выготский Л.С. (1962/2000). Психология. Москва, ЭКСМО-Пресс („Мышление и речь”, с. 262-509).
Гунаев З.С. (1977). О выражении пространственных отношений в некоторых дагестанских языках. Вопросы языкознания 6, с. 126-129.

Звегинцев В.А. (1996). Мысли о лингвистике. Москва, Издательство Московсково университета.

Златев И. (2006). Значение = жизнь (+ культура): Набросок единой биокультурной теории значения. В: А.В. Кравченко (ред.). Язык и познание. Studia linguistica cognitiva. Москва, Гнозис, с. 308-361.

Кравченко А.В. (2003). Что такое коммуникация? В: В.В. Дементьев (ред.). Прямая и непрямая коммуникация. Саратов, Колледж, с. 27-39.

Кравченко А.В. (2006). Методологический порок ортодоксального языкознания. В: М.В. Пименова (ред.). Новое в когнитивной лингвистике. Кемерово, с. 41-47.

Кравченко А.В. (2009). О традициях, языкознании и когнитивном подходе. В: Горизонты современной лингвистики: Традиции и новаторство. Москва, Языки славянских культур, с. 51-65.

Красных В.В. (2003). „Свой" среди „чужих": миф или реальность? Москва, Гнозис.

Лав Н. (2006). Когниция и языковой миф. В: А.В. Кравченко (ред.). Язык и познание: Методологические проблемы и перспективы. Studia linguistka wgnitwa 1. Москва, Гнозис, с. 105-134.

Рудяков А.Н. (2004). Язык, или почему люди говорят. Киев, Грамота.

Шерер В.Э. (1979). О выражении пространственных отношений в кетском языке. Вопросы языкознания 5, с. 103-108.

Aitchison, J. (1987). Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Oxford/UK, Cambridge/USA, Blackwell.

Clark, H.H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge University Press.

Fauconnier, G. (1999). Methods and Generalizations. In: T. Janssen, G. Redeker (eds.). Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology. Berlin, New York, Mouton de Gruyter, 95-127.

Finnegan, R. (2002). Communicating: The Multiple Modes of Human Interconnection. London, Routledge.

Gauker, C. (2003). Words without Meaning. Cambridge/MA, The MIT Press.

Kravchenko, A.V. (2007). Whence the Autonomy? A Reply to Harnad and Dror. Pragmatics & Cog- nition 15(3), 587-597.

Kress, G. (1997). Before Writing: Rethinking the Paths to Literacy. London, Routledge.

Lawrence, H. (1972). Viewpoint and Location in Oksapmin. Anthropological Linguistics 14(8), 311-316.

Locke, J. (1961). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London, Dent.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Vol. 1. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Malinowski, B. (1927). The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages. In: C.K. Ogden, I.A. Ri- chards. The Meaning of „Meaning”. 2nd revised edition. New York, Harcourt, Brace & Company, 296-336.

Maturana, H. (1978). Biology of Language: The Epistemology of Reality. In: G. Miller, E. Lenne- berg (eds.). Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought. New York, Academic Press, 28-62.

Maturana, H. (1983). On the Misuse of the Notion of Information in Biology. Journal of Social and Biological Structures 6, 155-158.

Millikan, R.G. (2005). Language: A biological Model. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Oleksy, M. (2002). Cognition, Language, and Praxis: Is Cognitive Linguistics on the Verge of the Practical Turn? In: B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, K. Turewicz (eds.). Cognitive Linguistics Today. Frankfurt a.Main, Peter Lang, 55-64.

Oim, H. (1977). Towards a Theory of Linguistic Pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 1(3), 251-267.

Pateman, T. (1987). Language in Mind and Language in Society: Studies in Linguistic Reproduc- tion. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Pinker, S. (1999). Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language. Basic Books.

Reddy, M. (1979). The Conduit Metaphor. In: A. Ortony (ed.). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 284-324.

Ross, D., Spurrett, D. (2004). What to Say to a Sceptical Metaphysician: A Defence Manual for Cognitive and Behavioural Scientists. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27, 603-647.

Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse. Oxford etc., Blackwell.

Sinha, C. (1999). Grounding, Mapping, and Acts of Meaning. In: T.Janssen, G. Redeker (eds.). Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology. Berlin, New York, Mouton de Gruyter, 223-255.

Sperber, D. (1995). How do We Communicate? In: J. Brockman, K. Matson (eds.). How Things Are: A Science Toolkit for the Mind. New York, Morrow, 191-199.

Tomasello, M. (2005). Beyond Formalities: The Case of Language Acquisition. The Linguistic Review 22, 183-197.

Verhagen, A. (2005). Construction of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford University Press.

Wilson, D. (1994). In: G. Brown, K. Malmkjaer, A. Pollitt, J.Williams (eds.). Language and Understanding. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 35-58.

Wilson, D. (1998). Linguistic Structure and Inferential Communication. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists, July 1997. Oxford, Elsevier.

Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press.

Glasersfeld, E. von (2001). Constructing Communication. Available [online] <http://www.uni- vie.ac.at/constructivism/~/glasersfeld01-interview.html>, retrieved on 13th January 2010.

Grice, H.P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge/MA, Harvard University Press.

Harris, R. (1981). The Language Myth. London, Duckworth.

Henry, D., Henry, K. (1969). Koyukon Locationals. Anthropological Linguistics 11(4), 136-142.

Hutton, C. (1993). Analysis and Notation: The Case for a Non-realist Linguistics. In: R. Harre, R. Harris (eds.). Linguistics and Philosophy: The Controversial Interface. Pergamon Press, 241-251.

Kravchenko, A.V. (2007). Whence the Autonomy? A Reply to Harnad and Dror. Pragmatics & Cog- nition 15(3), 587-597.

Kress, G. (1997). Before Writing: Rethinking the Paths to Literacy. London, Routledge.

Lawrence, H. (1972). Viewpoint and Location in Oksapmin. Anthropological Linguistics 14(8), 311-316.

Locke, J. (1961). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London, Dent.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Vol. 1. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Malinowski, B. (1927). The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages. In: C.K. Ogden, I.A. Ri- chards. The Meaning of „Meaning”. 2nd revised edition. New York, Harcourt, Brace & Company, 296-336.

Maturana, H. (1978). Biology of Language: The Epistemology of Reality. In: G. Miller, E. Lenne- berg (eds.). Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought. New York, Academic Press, 28-62.

Maturana, H. (1983). On the Misuse of the Notion of Information in Biology. Journal of Social and Biological Structures 6, 155-158.

Millikan, R.G. (2005). Language: A biological Model. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Oleksy, M. (2002). Cognition, Language, and Praxis: Is Cognitive Linguistics on the Verge of the Practical Turn? In: B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, K. Turewicz (eds.). Cognitive Linguistics Today. Frankfurt a.Main, Peter Lang, 55-64.

Oim, H. (1977). Towards a Theory of Linguistic Pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 1(3), 251-267.

Pateman, T. (1987). Language in Mind and Language in Society: Studies in Linguistic Reproduc- tion. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Pinker, S. (1999). Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language. Basic Books.

Reddy, M. (1979). The Conduit Metaphor. In: A. Ortony (ed.). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 284-324.

Ross, D., Spurrett, D. (2004). What to Say to a Sceptical Metaphysician: A Defence Manual for Cognitive and Behavioural Scientists. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27, 603-647.

Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse. Oxford etc., Blackwell.

Sinha, C. (1999). Grounding, Mapping, and Acts of Meaning. In: T.Janssen, G. Redeker (eds.). Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology. Berlin, New York, Mouton de Gruyter, 223-255.

Sperber, D. (1995). How do We Communicate? In: J. Brockman, K. Matson (eds.). How Things Are: A Science Toolkit for the Mind. New York, Morrow, 191-199.

Tomasello, M. (2005). Beyond Formalities: The Case of Language Acquisition. The Linguistic Review 22, 183-197.

Verhagen, A. (2005). Construction of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford University Press.

Wilson, D. (1994). In: G. Brown, K. Malmkjaer, A. Pollitt, J.Williams (eds.). Language and Understanding. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 35-58.

Wilson, D. (1998). Linguistic Structure and Inferential Communication. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists, July 1997. Oxford, Elsevier.

Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press.

Opublikowane
2011-12-01

Cited By /
Share

Кравченко, А. (2011). ЗНАЧЕНИЕ И КОММУНИКАЦИЯ КАК ЛИНЕВИСТИЧЕСКАЯ ПРОБЛЕМА И КОРНИ ЕЕ НЕПОНИМАНИЯ. Acta Neophilologica, 1(XIII), 91–104. Pobrano z https://czasopisma.uwm.edu.pl/index.php/an/article/view/1070

Александр Кравченко 
Байкальский государственный университет экономики и права