Published: 2023-12-23

Metaphors and Aporias – about the Necessity and Impossibility of Philosophy. Leszek Kołakowski’s Position

Ireneusz Ziemiński
Humanities and Natural Sciences
Section: Articles
https://doi.org/10.31648/hip.8635

Abstract

The subject matter of the article is not the evolution of Leszek Kołakowski’s views, but rather the metaphors (of a priest, a jester, a clown, and a charlatan) he employed to illustrate the role of a philosopher in culture. The priest believes that they are proclaiming divine truth which should be accepted by all people. Unable to be critical of their own views, a philosopher priest is a useful tool in the hands of power, propagating its ideology and justifying its actions, even the most sinister ones. The jester is a sceptic who doubts if it is even possible to discover the truth and questions the very existence of criteria which would allow one to distinguish between the rational and irrational. A philosopher-jester allows people to keep their distance from ideologies which are forced upon
them, and thus protects our freedom, especial ly freedom of thought. The clown is a rebel who mocks sanctities which are in fact unfounded myths directing our behavior. Therefore, a philosopher-clown reminds us that philosophy is an undertaking that is destined to fail – after all, everything we consider as truth is exposed as an illusion. Finally, a charlatan is a philosopher who realized that philosophy is doomed and is facing a choice: either to admit helplessness (which would lead to them being socially
useless) or to sell illusions as revelations (which would make them a liar). Thus, philosophy turns out to be an undertaking that is both necessary (searching for truth) and impossible (faced with the realization that truth is unobtainable a human mind becomes content with illusions).

Keywords:

philosophy, priest, jester, clown, charlatan, Leszek Kolakowski

Download files

Citation rules

Ziemiński, I. (2023). Metaphors and Aporias – about the Necessity and Impossibility of Philosophy. Leszek Kołakowski’s Position. Humanities and Natural Sciences, (29), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.31648/hip.8635

Cited by / Share

This website uses cookies for proper operation, in order to use the portal fully you must accept cookies.