The Paradigm of Science Education: an Attempt of Philosophical and Conceptual Foundations Explication

Yuliia Aleksandrova

Department of Social Philosophy, Philosophy of Education and Education Policy, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, 9 Pyrohova str., 010601 Kyiv


Abstract

The article presents the issues related to the science teaching paradigm, which extends the traditional understanding of the goal of education as an experience of humanity acquired through continuous progress and development. It has been proven that J. Dewey’s pragmatic philosophy, like all contemporary epistemology, assumes that the cognitive goal of the processes of establishing and confirming meaning is a valuable and pragmatic confrontation of the acquired knowledge. It follows that there are specific philosophical positions in the research process: subjectivism as an individual search for an innovative way to solve a problem, and objectivity, reflecting the de-personification of experimental procedures and methods, and consensus in this context means using a formalized language to publish the results. According to the principles of constructivism, the process of education itself should be treated as a construction of a certain type of worldview, evaluation, and behavior. Learning, in line with the science teaching paradigm, is the concretization and interpretation of society’s enduring discursive practices. The educational process is an interaction in determining a collective way of defining and understanding phenomena and processes. In science education, it is postulated to reject the traditionally established practices of academic theorizing and adopt the position of authority uncritically. Instead, there is a problematization of the fundamental discourse.


Keywords:

nauka, naukowa edukacja, pragmatyzm, konstruktywizm, postmodernizm, badania, doświadczenie, eksperyment, komunikatywne społeczeństwo, dyskursywność


Blades David W., 2006, Levinas and an Ethics for Science Education, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 38(5), p. 647-664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00217.x
Crossref   Google Scholar

Burbules Nicholas C., Linn Marcia C., 1991, Science education and philosophy of science: Compatibility or Contradiction? International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 13(3), p. 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069910130302
Crossref   Google Scholar

Burgh Gilbert, Nichols Kim, 2012, The Parallels Between Philosophical Inquiry and Scientific Inquiry: Implications for science education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 44(10), p. 1045-1059. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00751.x
Crossref   Google Scholar

Czyż Anna, Svyrydenko Denys, 2019, Science Education as a Response to the Needs of the Modern Open “Education for Everyone” System, Future Human Image, Vol. 11, p. 14-21. https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/11/2
Crossref   Google Scholar

Dovgyi Stanislav, Nebrat Viktoriya, Svyrydenko Denys, Babiichuk Svitlana, 2020, Science education in the age of Industry 4.0: challenges to economic development and human capital growth in Ukraine, Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, Issue 1, p. 146-151. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-1/146
Crossref   Google Scholar

Gordon Mordechai, 2016, Why Should Scholars Keep Coming Back to John Dewey? Educational Philosophy and Theory Volume 48 (Issue 10: Dewey’s Democracy and Education in an Era of Globalization), p. 1077-1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1150800
Crossref   Google Scholar

Gough Noel, 2006, Shaking the Tree, Making a Rhizome: Towards a nomadic geophilosophy of science education, Educational Philosophy and Theory Volume, 38(5), p. 625-645. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00216.x
Crossref   Google Scholar

Fackler Ayça Karaşahinoğlu, 2020, How Do We Teach Science the Dewey Way? Kappa Delta Pi Record Volume 56(4), p. 148-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2020.1813499
Crossref   Google Scholar

Frank Jeff, 2017, Realizing a Democratic Community of Teachers: John Dewey and the Idea of a Science of Education, 7(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010011
Crossref   Google Scholar

Hodson Derek, 1985, Philosophy of Science, Science and Science Education, Studies in Science Education, Vol. 12(1), p. 25-57, https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268508559922
Crossref   Google Scholar

Lee Eun Ah, Brown Matthew J., 2016, Connecting Inquiry and Values in Science Education: An Approach based on John Dewey’s Perspective. UNSPECIFIED. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/12563/   Google Scholar

Mackenzie Jim, Ron Good, James Robert Brown, 2014, Postmodernism and Science Education: An Appraisal. International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 1057-1083.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Martin Michael, 1974, The Relevance of Philosophy of Science for Science Education. Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 1974, p. 293-300.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Peters Michael A., 2006, Philosophy of Science Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, Volume 38(5), p. 579-584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00223.x
Crossref   Google Scholar

Petrenko Ihor, Filipchuk Vasyl, 2020, The Specifics of the Formation of Think Tanks’ System in Asia (the Case of Japan) and Australia, Ukrainian Policymaker, Vol. 7, p. 43-51. https://doi.org/10.29202/up/7/6
Crossref   Google Scholar

Pugh Kevin J., Mark Girod, 2007, Science, Art, and Experience: Constructing a Science Pedagogy From Dewey’s Aesthetics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, Vol. 18(1), p. 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9029-0
Crossref   Google Scholar

Semetsky Inna, 2013, On the Creative Logic of Education, or: Re‐reading Dewey through the lens of complexity science. Complexity Theory and the Philosophy of Education, Vol. 6, p. 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00409.x
Crossref   Google Scholar

Slezak Peter, 2014, Appraising Constructivism in Science Education. International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, p. 1023-1057.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Svyrydenko Denys, Yatsenko Olena, 2019, Science education as a way of transforming an anthropological project into human capital, Revista Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores. Vol. VII, Special Issue. Article No.19, October. https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v29i1.1930
Crossref   Google Scholar

Svyrydenko Denys, Yatsenko Olena, Prudnikova Olena, 2019, Organicity of the phenomenon of culture as an explication of vitality, Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, No. 16, p. 7-23. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i16.188227
Crossref   Google Scholar

Tanner Daniel, 2018, The Lost Sources of a Science of Education. Kappa Delta Pi Record Volume 54(2), p. 82-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2018.1443678
Crossref   Google Scholar

Terepyshchyi Serhii, Khomenko Hleb, 2019, Development of Methodology for Applying Non-Violent Conflict Resolution in Academic Environment. Future Human Image, Volume 12, p. 94-103. https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/12/8
Crossref   Google Scholar

Thorburn Malcolm, 2019, Social democracy, economic liberalism and physical education: a Dewey-informed review of philosophical and pedagogical possibilities. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, Vol. 27(1), p. 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2018.1513421
Crossref   Google Scholar

Thorburn Malcolm, 2020, Embodied experiences: Critical insights from Dewey for contemporary education. Educational Research, Vol. 62(1), p. 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1711437
Crossref   Google Scholar

Tomlinson Stephen, 1997, Edward Lee Thorndike and John Dewey on the Science of Education. Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 23, p. 365-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498970230307
Crossref   Google Scholar

Weinstock Henry Robert, 1966, Dewey’s Views on a Science of Education. The Educational Forum, Vol. 30(4), p. 491-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131726609339754
Crossref   Google Scholar

Zembylas Michalinos, 2013, Science Education as Emancipatory: The case of Roy Bhaskar’s philosophy of meta‐Reality. Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 38(5), p. 665-676. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00218.x
Crossref   Google Scholar

Download


Published
2021-12-13

Cited by

Aleksandrova, Y. (2021). The Paradigm of Science Education: an Attempt of Philosophical and Conceptual Foundations Explication. Studia Warmińskie, 58, 205–218. https://doi.org/10.31648/sw.7013

Yuliia Aleksandrova 
Department of Social Philosophy, Philosophy of Education and Education Policy, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, 9 Pyrohova str., 010601 Kyiv