The Virtues of Xiao (Filial Piety) and Ti (Brotherly Obedience) as Two Pillars of Confucian Familism
Zbigniew Wesołowski
Monumenta Serica Institute, Arnold-Janssen-Str. 20, 53757 Sankt Augustinhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3449-4830
Abstract
In imperial China (221 BC – 1911), filial piety (xiao) and brotherly obedience (ti) were two core values of family life. Confucian familism made filial piety a cornerstone of the entire social order. The original use of the word xiao from the Western Zhou dynasty (ca. 1045–771 BC) refers primarily to ritual services to deceased parents and ancestors. Later, the Confucians of the Warring States (475–221 BC) thought of xiao particularly as showing obedience and displaying respect towards parents. After the late Warring States, the Confucians again reinterpreted xiao extending it to a political dimension, i.e., obedience and respect to one’s lord. Since then, xiao as the dutiful submission of children to their parents has become the basis for both self-cultivation and the political order. Filial sons were also understood as loyal retainers to meet the needs of the emerging bureaucratic state in imperial China. Down through the centuries, parents constantly taught their children to treat elders with filial piety and brotherly obedience, this behavior being a central measure of the children’s moral worth. Although Confucian thought on the family still has its value and relevance in present-day China, it is increasingly exposed to many challenges. This situation is a consequence of the profound transformation of traditional family ethics, values and institutions brought about by the processes of modernization and globalization.
Keywords:
familism, Confucianism, filial piety, brotherly obedience, ChinaReferences
Ames Roger T., 2011, Confucian Role Ethics: A Vocabulary, Honolulu.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Boltz William, 1993, Hsiao ching 孝經, in: Michael Loewe (ed.), Early Chinese Texts: A Bibliographical Guide, Berkeley, pp. 141-152. Google Scholar
Brown Donald E., 1991, Human Universals, New York. Google Scholar
Clark Donald N., 1983, The Ming Connection: Notes on Korea’s Experience in the Chinese Tributary System, Transactions of the Korea Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, No. 58, pp. 77-89. Google Scholar
Bart Dessein, 2014, Faith and Politics: (New) Confucianism as Civil Religion, Asian Studies, No. 2/1, pp. 39-64.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Ebrey Patricia B., 2003, Xiao 孝 (Filial Piety), in: Yao Xinzhong (ed.), RoutledgeCurzon Encyclopedia of Confucianism, London – New York, vol. 2 (O-Z), pp. 680-681. Google Scholar
Guangdong tongzhi 廣東通志 (General History of Guangdong), “Liezhuan san” [Biographies, Part Three], the 1822 edition, vol. 4, juan 270, p. 4691 Google Scholar
Holcombe Charles, 2013, The Xianbei in Chinese History, Early Medieval China, No. 19, pp. 1-38.
Crossref
Google Scholar
David K. Jordan, The Traditional Chinese Family & Lineage (https://pages.ucsd.edu/~dkjordan/chin/familism.html; accessed on 24.03.2022 Content created: 2006-03-20; File Last Modified: 2022-01-01). Google Scholar
Knapp Keith N., 2003, Ershisi xiao 二十四孝 (The Twenty-Four Filial Exemplars), in: Yao Xinzhong (ed.), RoutledgeCurzon Encyclopedia of Confucianism. London – New York, vol. 1 (A-N), pp. 200-201. Google Scholar
Knapp Keith N., 2003, Ti 悌 (Fraternal), in: Yao Xinzhong (ed.), RoutledgeCurzon Encyclopedia of Confucianism, London – New York, vol. 2 (O-Z), p. 604. Google Scholar
Knapp Keith N., 1995, The Ru Reinterpretation of Xiao, Early China, No. 20, pp. 195-222.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Keightley David N., 2004, The Making of the Ancestors: Late Shang Religion and Its Legacy, in: John Lagerwey (ed.), Religion and Chinese Society, Hong Kong – Paris, pp. 3-63.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Kulp Daniel H., 1925, Country Life in South China: The Sociology of Familism, New York. Google Scholar
Lagerwey John (ed.), 2004, Religion and Chinese Society, Hong Kong – Paris.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Lee Shu-ching, 1953, China’s Traditional Family, Its Characteristics and Disintegration, American Sociological Review, No. 18, pp. 272-280.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Liang Shuming, 1989, Dong-Xi wenhua ji qi zhexue東西文化及其哲學 (Eastern and Western Cultures and Their Philosophies; 1921), in: Liang Shuming quanji, vol. I, pp. 319-547. Google Scholar
Liang Shuming, 1990. Zhongguo wenhua yaoyi 中國文化要義 (An Essential Meaning of Chinese Culture), in: Liang Shuming quanji, vol. III, pp. 1-316. Google Scholar
Liang Shuming, Liang Shuming quanji 梁漱溟全集 (Collected Works of Liang Shuming), vol. I to VIII (Zhongguo wenhua shuyuan xueshu weiyuanhui bian 中國文化書院學術委員會編, Ji’nan, vols. I and II (1989), vol. III (1990), vol. IV (1991), vols. V and VI (1992), vols. VII and VIII (1993). Google Scholar
Qi Xiaoying, 2015, Filial Obligation in Contemporary China: Evolution of the Culture-system, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, No. 45/1, pp. 141-161.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Poškaitė Loreta, 2014, Filial Piety (xiao 孝) in the Contemporary and Global World: A View from the Western and Chinese Perspectives, Asian Studies, No. 2/1, pp. 99-114.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Henry Rosemont Jr. and Roger T. Ames, 2016, Confucian Role Ethics: A Moral Vision for the 21st Century?, Taipei.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Shun Kwong-loi, 2003, Xiao (Hsiao): Filial Piety, in: Antonio S. Cua (ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy, New York – London: Routledge, pp. 793-795. Google Scholar
Smith Arthur H., 2002, Chinese Characteristics, Norwalk CT (originally 1894). Google Scholar
Stephen O’Sullivan and Philip A. Pecorino, 2002, ETHICS: An Online Text-book, Chapter 7: Deontological Theories: Natural Law, Section 4: ‘Natural Law Theory’ (http://www.qcc.cuny.edu/SocialSciences/ppecorino/ETHICS_TEXT/Chapter_7_Deontological_Theories_Natural_Law/Natural_Law_Theory.htm; accessed on 24.03.2022). Google Scholar
Rolf Trauzettel, 1977, Individuum und Heteronomie: Historische Aspekte des Verhältnisses von Individuum und Gesellschaft in China, Saeculum, No. 28/3, pp. 340-362 (English translation: Historical Aspects of the Individual-Society Relationship in China, in: Society, Culture, and Patterns of Behaviour (East Asian Civiäzations: New Attempts at Understanding Traditions 3/4), edited by C.-A. Seyschab, A. Sievers, and S. Szynkiewicz, Unkel/ Rhein: Horlemann. 1990, pp. 25-70).
Crossref
Google Scholar
Whyte Martin, 2004, Filial Obligations in Chinese Families: Paradoxes of Modernization, in: Charlotte Ikels (ed.), Filial Piety: Practice and Discourse in Contemporary East Asia, Stanford, p. 106.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Wu John, 1951, Beyond East and West, New York. Google Scholar
Yao Xinzhong (ed.), 2003, RoutledgeCurzon Encyclopedia of Confucianism, London – New York: RoutledgeCurzon, vol. 1 (A-N) and vol. 2 (O-Z). Google Scholar
Yao Xinzhong and Zhao Yanxia, 2010, Chinese Religion: A Contextual Approach, London – New York. Google Scholar
Zhang Donia, 2017, Courtyard Housing in China: Chinese Quest for Harmony, Contemporary Urban Affairs, No. 1/2, pp. 38-56.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Monumenta Serica Institute, Arnold-Janssen-Str. 20, 53757 Sankt Augustin
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3449-4830