Co-existing with the Other in the Aspect of the Problem of Fluctuations of Personality in the Society
Oksana Petinova
Department of Philosophy, Sociology and Management Sociocultural Activitie, University of Ushinsky, 26, Staroportofrankivs`ka St., Odessahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1871-1201
Ekaterina Tkachenko
The Institute of Languages and Media, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, 243 Hong Ye Lu, Bengshan District, Bengbu, AnhuiAbstract
In this article an analysis of the concept of the Other in the context of the issue of “I and the Other” is introduced, and the ways through which the process of identification of personality within the framework of coexistence with the Other are shown within the context of phenomenological philosophy. The problem of identification is analysed as an integral part of the problem of the Other, since an individual always acts within the horizon of the intersubjective heritage. A person is born in a certain cultural tradition, without the intersubjective dimension of which their self-identification is impossible. A person is born in a world which is already imbued with the meanings of others, therefore, there always exists a need for their self-identification, which cannot be done without active participation of the Other. The processes of globalization, informatisation and post-industrialisation indicate that in the modern world social reality is constructed through brand-new algorithms, which cannot but impact the processes of socialization and self-identification, and lead to personality’s deep changes, which are made evident by its fluctuations.
References
Вальденфельс Бернгард, 1999, Мотив чужого, Минск: Пропилеи [Waldenfels Bernhard, Phenomenology of the Alien]. Google Scholar
Гуссерль Эдмунд, 1994, Философия как строгая наука, Новочеркасск: Сагуна [Edmund Husserl, Philosophy as a Rigorous Science]. Google Scholar
Гуссерль Эдмунд, 1998, Картезианские размышления (Д. В. Скляднев, Пер.), Санкт-Петербург: Наука, Ювента [Edmund Husserl, Cartesian Reflections]. Google Scholar
Гуссерль Эдмунд, 2009, Идеи к чистой феноменологии и феноменологической философии. Книга первая. Общее введение в чистую феноменологию, Москва: Академический Проект [Edmund Husserl, Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology]. Google Scholar
Левінас Еммануель, 1997, Права людини і добра воля, Київ: Дух і Літера [Levinas Emmanuel, Human Rights and Goodwill]. Google Scholar
Левінас Еммануель, 1999, Між нами. Дослідження. Думки про іншого (В. Куринський, Пер.), Київ: Дух і Літера [Levinas Emmanuel, Between us. Research. Thoughts about the Other]. Google Scholar
Мерло-Понти Морис, 2006, Видимое и невидимое (О. Н. Шпарага, Пер.), Минск: Логвинов [Merleau-Ponty Maurice, The Visible and the Invisible]. Google Scholar
Рикёр Поль, 2002, Конфликт интерпретаций. Очерки о герменевтике (И. Вдовина, Пер.), Москва: «КАНОН-пресс-Ц»; «Кучково поле» [Ricoeur Paul, The Conflict of Interpretations. Essays on Hermeneutics]. Google Scholar
Рикёр Поль, 2008, Я-сам как другой, Москва: Издательство гуманитарной литературы [Ricoeur Paul, Oneself as Another]. Google Scholar
Department of Philosophy, Sociology and Management Sociocultural Activitie, University of Ushinsky, 26, Staroportofrankivs`ka St., Odessa
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1871-1201
The Institute of Languages and Media, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, 243 Hong Ye Lu, Bengshan District, Bengbu, Anhui
