Co-evolution of Human Corporeality and the Technosphere: a Philosophical-Anthropological Discourse
Valentina Bogachenko
Philosophy, Psychology and Pedagogy Department, A.S. Popov Odessa National Academy of Telecommunications, Kuznechnaya St. 1, 65020 Odessahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4105-0480
Abstract
This study reflects the development and transformation strategies of the anthropological situation in the context of technological progress. The change of the natural way of human existence to the technogenic method of communication leads to the formation of the image of «a virtual personality». The process of assimilation of natural and artificial takes place. Ethical alternatives of the human existence as a species within the Technosphere and the preservation of their humanistic imperative through the bodily projections of the personality are considered. Co-evolution of man and the Technosphere leads to a new way of their interaction and generates Technogenic Anthropology. The study of corporeality in various areas of human life is reflected in its ontological disclosure through the nominal classification: «biological body», «social body», «cultural body», and «virtual body». Plasticity is revealed as the main value and quality, which provides self-reflection in various forms of communication of modern man.
Keywords:
co-evolution, human corporeality, technosphere, technogenic anthropology, virtual reality, “virtual personality”, “virtual corporeality”References
Gardner Howard, 1993, Multiple intelligences: Theory in practice, New York, NY: Basic Books.
Haff Peter, 2014, Humans and technology in the Anthropocene: Six rules, The Anthropocene Review 2014, vol. 1(2) 126–136, DOI: 10.1177/2053019614530575.
Kagan Moses, 1996, Philosophy of Culture, St. Pb., LLP TC “Petropolis”.
McLuhan Marshall, 1994, Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, London; New York: Routledge, 2010, cop.
Merleau-Ponty Maurice, 2013, Phenomenology of Perception, Routledge.
Moiseev Nikita, 1998, Once again on the issue of Сo-evolutionthe, Questions of Philosophy, No. 8, p. 26–32, http://www.ecolife.ru/jornal/ecap/1998-2-2.shtml.
Nancy Jean-Luc, 1999, Corpus, М.: Ad Marginem Publ.
Nancy Jean-Luc, 2006, Body: inside or out. Fifty-eight body testimonies, Blue sofa, Vol. 9, M., p. 122–138, http://intelros.ru/pdf/siniy_divan/09/9.pdf.
Ortega-y-Gasset Jose, 1993, Reflections of technology, Questions of philosophy, No. 5, p.164–232, https://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/expertize/5483.
Revonsuo Antti, 2006, Inner Presence: Consciousness as a Biological Phenomenon, MA: The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Rothacker Erich, 1966, Philosophische Anthropologie, Bouvier, Bonn.
Rozin Vadim, 2004, Internet – a new information technology, semiosis, virtual environment // Influence of the Internet on the consciousness and structure of knowledge, M.: IF RAS, p. 3–23.
Schmitz Hermann, Müllan Rudolf & Slaby Jan, 2011, Emotions outside the box – the new phenomenology of feeling and corporeality, Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences, vol. 10, p. 241–259, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11097-011-9195-1.
Vernadsky Vladimir, Some Words About The Noösphere1 by Vladimir I. Vernadsky, Spring 2005, 21st Century Science&Technology, p. 16–21, http://21sci-tech.com/translations/The_Noosphere.pdf.
Zalasiewicz Jan et al., 2008, Are we now living in the Anthropocene?, GSA Today, vol. 18, no. 2 , p. 4–8, doi: 10.1130/GSAT01802A.1.
Philosophy, Psychology and Pedagogy Department, A.S. Popov Odessa National Academy of Telecommunications, Kuznechnaya St. 1, 65020 Odessa
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4105-0480
