Habermas J., La technique et la science comme idéologie (1968), Gallimard, Paris
Habermas J., Théorie de l’agir communicationnel, 2 tomes, trans. J-M. Ferry and J-L. Schlegel, Fayard, Paris 1987 1973.
Fischer F., Citizens, Experts and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge, Duke University Press, Durham NC 2000 <www.senat.fr/opecst/>.
Vig N., Paschen H., Parliaments and Technology. The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe, State University of New York Press 2000
Powell W. W., Dimaggio, P. J., The new Institutionalism in Organisation Analysis, University of Chicago Press 1991
Dziedzicki J-M., La médiation environnementale: une comparaison internationale, ESA-EDF-DER, Paris 1998
Reber B., Technology Assessment as Policy Analysis: From Expert Advice to Participatory Approaches, (in:) F. Fischer, G. Miller, M. Sidney (eds.), Handbook of Public Policy Analysis. Theory, Politics and Methods, “Public Administration and Public Policy Series” 125, Rutgers University/CRC Press, New York 2006
Sclove R., Democracy and Technologies, Guilford Press, New-York 1995
Kleinman L. (ed.), Science, Technology & Democracy, State University Press of New York 2000
Callon M., Lascoumes P., Barthe Y., Agir dans un monde incertain. Essai sur la démocratie technique, Seuil, Paris 2001
Cheveigné de S., Boy D., Galloux J-C., Les Biotechnologies en débat. Pour une démocratie scientifique, Balland, Paris 2002.
Latour Cf. B., Les politiques de la nature. Comment faire entrer les sciences en démocratie, La Découverte, Paris 1999.
Ferry J-M., Les puissances de l’expérience, Cerf, 2 vol., Paris 1991.
Simon See J., Bellucci S. (eds.), Participatory Technology Assessment. European Perspectives, Centre for the Study of Democracy and Swiss Centre for Technology Assessment, Bern – London 2003
Technology Assessment in Europe, between Method and Impact, financed by the European Commission, 2002
Fischer F., Citizens, Experts and the Environment...; Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices, Oxford University Press 2003
Joss S. (ed.), Special Issue on Public Participation in Science and Technology. Science and Public Policy, vol. 26, no. 5, Octobre 1999
Hennen L., Participatory Technology Assessment: a Response to Technical Modernity?, (in:) Special Issue on Public Participation in Science and Technology. Science and Public Policy, vol. 26, no. 5, Octobre 1999
Klüver L., Project Management. A matter of Ethics and robust Decision, “EUROPTA”, [online] <www.tekno.dk/pdf/projekter/europta_Report.pdf.>.
Fiorino D. J., Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanism, “Science, Technology & Human Values” 1990, vol. 15, no. 2
Rowe G., Frewer J. L., Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation, “Science, Technology & Human Values” 2000, vol. 25, no. 1,
Renn O., Webler T., Kastenholz H., Procedural and substantive Fairness in landfill Sitting: a Swiss Case Study, “Risk: Health, Safety and Environment” 1996, no. 7,
Reber B., Technologies et débat démocratique en Europe. De la participation à l’évaluation pluraliste, “Revue Française de Science Politique” 2005, vol. 55, no. 5–6,
Reber See B., Les controverses scientifiques publiques au secours de la démocratie, “République cherche démocratie et plus si aff., Cosmopolitiques. Cahiers théoriques pour l’écologie politique” 2003, no. 3
Boy D., Donnet-Kamel D., Roqueplo P., Un exemple de démocratie participative:, “Revue Française de Sciences Politiques” 2000, vol. 50
<www.conseil-economique-et-social.fr/ces_dat2/plan.htm>.
<www.cite-des-sciences.fr>.
Reber B., Public Assessment and new Rules for the “Human Park”, (in:) B. Latour, P. Weibel, Making Things Public. Atmospheres of Democracy, MIT Press, Cambridge 2005
Reber B. (dir.), La Bioéthique en débat, “Archives de philosophie du droit” 2010, no. 53.
Reber B., La démocratie génétiquement modifiée. Sociologies éthiques de l’évaluation des technologies controversées, Presses de l’Université Laval 2010.
<www.loka.org/pages/worldpanels.htm>.
Reber B., La Nouveauté éthique des “nouvelles technologies”. Les techniques confrontées à l’exigence apocalytpique. [The ethical novelty of “New technologies”. Techniques confronted the Apocaliptic], PhD Thesis, Centre Raymond Aron, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, 1999.
Reber B., Ethics in Participatory Technology Assessment, “Technikfolgenabschätzung, Theorie und Praxis” 2006, no. 2 (15)
<www.itas. fzk.de/tatup/062/rebe06a.htm>.
Canto-Sperber M., L’inquiétude morale, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris 2001
Pharo P., Morale et sociologie, Gallimard, Paris 2004
Reber B., Brossaud C., Digital Cognitive Technologies. Epistemology and Knowledge Economy, ISTE/John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010.
Google Scholar