Metaphorical modelling of cognitive structure of the concept STINGINESS in British, German, Ukrainian and Russian linguocultures
Kostiantyn Mizin
Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical UniversityOlexandr Petrov
Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubinsky State Pedagogical UniversityAbstract
This article deals with determining peculiarities of metaphorical modelling of cognitive structure of the concept STINGINESS in British, German, Ukrainian and Russian linguocultures by the way of analysing phraseological objectivation of the concept in the light of the relevant contrastive-linguoculturological approach. The authors establish that mainly common metaphoric models lie at the basis of the metaphors representing the concept STINGINESS. It is determined that despite the prevalence of metaphors containing common meaning of stinginess in the researched linguocultures distinct prevalence of common cognitive features over the specific ones within the metaphors themselves (metaphoric models), the concept STINGINESS is largely filled with ethnically and linguoculturally specific meanings in the contrasted language communities, that is proved by the metaphors STINGINESS IS ILLUSION by British and Germans, STINGINESS IS MEANNESS by British, STINGINESS IS SHAME by Ukrainians, STINGINESS IS NOT A FULLISH THING by Ukrainians and Russians. It is noteworthy that most of the conceptual metaphors representing the concept STINGINESS are commonly found in all the four linguocultures.
Keywords:
contrastive linguoculturology concept of stinginess metaphoric models cognitive structureReferences
Lavrova, N. (2010), Contamination: An Apt Linguistic Term or a Misnomer? In: International Journal of Arts and Sciences. 3 (16), 148–153.
Mizin, K./Petrov, O. (2016), Concept metaphor “STINGINESS IS A SICK PERSON” in British, German, Ukrainian and Russian linguocultures: contrastive-linguoculturological analysis. In: Science and Education a New Dimension. Philology. IV (17)/78, 51–53.
Palmer, G. (1996), Towards a Theory of Cultural Linguistics. Austin TX.
Зыкова, И. (2015), Теория и методы лингвокультурологического изучения фразеологии. В: Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski. VI/1, 181–195.
Киклевич, А. (2010), Концепт! Концепт… Концепт? К критике современной лингвистической концептологии. В: Киклевич, А./Камалова, А. (ред.), Концепты культуры в языке и тексте: теория и анализ. Ольштын, 175–219.
Кочетков, В. (2002), Психология межкультурных различий. Москва. Мізін, К. (2012), Нові напрями в українському мовознавстві: зіставна лінгвокультурологія. У: Мовознавство. 6 (268), 38–52.
Мізін, К. (2015), Методологічна валідність лінгвокультурології vs зіставної лінгвокультурології:
аргументи та контраргументи. У: Вісник Дніпропетровського університету ім. А. Нобеля. 2 (10), 104–110.
Мізін, К./Петров, О. (2014), Морально-етичний параметр концепту «ЩЕДРІСТЬ» у британській, німецькій, українській і російській лінгвокультурах. У: Мовознавство. 5 (278), 71–80.
Павлова, А. (2015), Лингвокультурология в России: «за» и «против». В: Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski. VI/2, 201–221.
Петров, О. (2014), Філософсько-релігійний, психологічний і морально-етичний параметри концепту СКУПІСТЬ у британській, німецькій, українській і російській лінгвокультурах.
У: Наукові записки Вінницького державного педагогічного університету ім. М. Коцюбинського. Вінниця. 20, 269–277.
Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University
Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubinsky State Pedagogical University
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kostiantyn Mizin, Letiucha Liubov, Oleksandr Petrov, Representation of subjectively-evaluative derivates realization in modern Russian: verbal evaluatives , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020): Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski
Similar Articles
- Aleksander Kiklewicz, Helena Pociechina, Language creativity of the protest discourses in Belarus after the 2020 presidential election , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021): East European Review
- Liana Hurska-Kowalczyk, Theoretical approaches to the analysis of ‘colour revolutions’ in post-Soviet space , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021): East European Review
- Daniya Zagidullina, Tatar literature at the turn of the XX–XXI centuries: transformation of realism , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 9 No. 1 (2018): East European Review
- Yurii Zemskyi, Oleksandr Trygub, The Polish problem in Russian conservative political thought in mid-19th century , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021): East European Review
- Maxim Popov, Conflict Resolution Strategy as Political Integration Resource: Theoretical Perspectives on Resolving Ethnic Conflicts in the North Caucasus , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 9 No. 1 (2018): East European Review
- Kostiantyn Mizin, Letiucha Liubov, Oleksandr Petrov, Representation of subjectively-evaluative derivates realization in modern Russian: verbal evaluatives , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020): Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski
- Tatiana Yanko, The system of the Russian prosody , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020): Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski
- Viktor Hryshchuk, Oksana Hryshchuk, Antonina Tokarska, Values and communication in modern Ukraine: to the topic of correlation , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020): Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski
- Vera Antropova, Spiritual and value identification in the discourse of Russian printed media: between nationalism and cosmopolitanism , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020): Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski
- Alla A. Kamalova, Gennady I. Berestnev, Emotions as an Object of Linguistic Study (on the Material of the Russian Language) , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Vol. 10 No. 2 (2019): Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski Tom 10 Nr 2 (2019)
<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
