Analysis of one lexicographic case: the Russian noun svist ‘whistle’
Aleksander Kiklewicz
University of Warmia and Mazury in OlsztynAbstrakt
The subject of the article is the application of the case study method to the description of lexical semantics, in particular, to the analysis of a dictionary entry. The author considers the Russian noun SVIST ‘whistle’ as an object, namely, its description in the “Dictionary of the Russian language” (1984). Semantic analysis shows that the description of the word polysemy in the dictionary does not correspond to the nature of the semantic representations that are assigned to this lexeme. The author offers his own version of the semantic description of this noun, in particular, using the category of image-schematic structure. Special attention is devoted to the problem of the dictionary presentation of syntactic representations, i.e. combinatory of the word.
Słowa kluczowe:
lexical semantics, case study, word meaning, semantic representation, lexical representation, polysemyBibliografia
АПРЕСЯН, Ю. Д. (2009), Исследования по семантике и лексикографии. Том 1: парадигматика. Москва. [Apresân, Û. D. (2009), Issledovaniâ po semantike i leksikografii. Tom 1: paradigmatika. Moskva.] Google Scholar
ВДОВИЧЕНКО, А. В. (2018), Акциональное смыслообразование: что порождается и понимается в есте-ственном коммуникативном процессе. В: Вопросы психолингвистики. 3 (37), 112-125. [Vdovi¬čen¬ko, A. V. (2018), Akcionalʹnoe smysloobrazovanie: čto poroždaetsâ i ponimaetsâ v estestvennom kommu-nikativnom processe. V: Voprosy psiholingvistiki. 3 (37), 112-125.] Google Scholar
ЕВГЕНЬЕВА, А. П. (ред.) (1981), Словарь русского языка. Т. 4. Москва. [Evgenʹeva, A. P. (red.) (1981),Slovarʹ russkogo âzyka. T. 4. Moskva] Google Scholar
ЗЕЛЕНИН, А. В. (2014), Как свистят русские. В: Русский язык в школе. 1, 77-84. [Zelenin, A. V. (2014), Kak svistât russkie. V: Russkij âzyk v škole. 1, 77-84.] Google Scholar
КАРУНЦ, Р. Г. (1975), Семантическая структура глаголов звучания в современном русском языке. Москва (диссертация). [Karunc, R. G. (1975), Semantičeskaâ struktura glagolov zvučaniâ v sovremennom russkom âzyke. Moskva (dissertaciâ).] Google Scholar
КИКЛЕВИЧ, А. | КОРЫТКОВСКАЯ, М. (2012), Экспликативный синтаксис как информационная база лекси-кографического описания глаголов (на материале польского и русского языков). В: Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. VIII (3), 557-572. [Kiklewicz, A. | Korytkowska, M. (2012), Èksplikativnyj sin-taksis kak informacionnaâ baza leksikografičeskogo opisaniâ glagolov (na materiale polʹskogo i russko-go âzykov). V: Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. VIII (3), 557-572.] Google Scholar
КУЗНЕЦОВ, С. А. (1998), Большой толковый словарь русского языка. Санкт-Петербург. [Kuznecov, S. A. (1998), Bolʹšoj tolkovyj slovarʹ russkogo âzyka. Sankt-Peterburg.] Google Scholar
ЛАКОФФ, Дж. (1988), Язык в зеркале классификаторов. В: Петров, В. В. | Герасимов, В. И. (ред.), Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. XXIII: Когнитивные аспекты языка. Москва, 12-50. [Lakoff, G. (1988), Âzyk v zerkale klassifikatorov. V: Petrov. V. V. | Gerasimov, V. I. (red.), Novoe v zarubežnoj lingvistike. Vyp. XXIII: Kognitivnye aspekty âzyka. Moskva, 12-50.] Google Scholar
ЛИНДСЕЙ, П. | НОРМАН, Д. (1974), Переработка информации у человека. Введение в психологию. Москва. [Lindsay, P. | Norman, D. (1974), Pererabotka informacii u čeloveka. Vvedenie v psihologiû. Moskva] Google Scholar
ОЖЕГОВ, С. И. | ШВЕДОВА, Н. Ю. (1992), Толковый словарь русского языка. Москва. [Ožegov, S. I. | Švedova,N. Û. (1992), Tolkovyj slovarʹ russkogo âzyka. Moskva.] Google Scholar
СОЛСО, Р. (2012), Когнитивная психология. Москва etc. [Solso, R. 2012), Kognitivnaâ psihologiâ. Moskva etc.] Google Scholar
СТЕПАНОВ, Ю. С. (2007), Концепты. Тонкая пленка цивилизации. Москва. [STePANOV, J. S. (2007), Koncep-ty. Tonkaâ plenka civilizacii. Moskva.] Google Scholar
УХВАНОВА-ШМЫГОВА, И. Ф. (2014), Каузально-генетический подход в контексте лингвистики дискурса. Минск. [UHVANOVA-ŠMYGOVA, I. F. (2014), Kauzalʹno-genetičeskij podhod v kontekste lingvistiki diskursa. Minsk.] Google Scholar
BRESNAN, J. | ASUDEH, A. | TOIVONEN, I. et al. (2016), Lexical-functional Syntax. Hoboken.
Crossref
Google Scholar
GOLDBERG, A. | JACKENDOFF, R. (2004), The English resultative as a family of constructions. In: Language. 80 (3), 532-568.
Crossref
Google Scholar
GOLDBERG, A. (1995), Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago. Google Scholar
GÖTZ, D. | HAENSCH, G. | WELLMANN, H. (Hrsg.) (1993), Langenscheidts Größwörterbuch. Deutsch als Fremd-sprache. Berlin etc. Google Scholar
HALLIDAY, M. A. K. (2002), Collected Works. Volume 1. London – New York. Google Scholar
HOLLMANN, W. B. | SIEWIERSKA, A. (2011), The status of frequency, schemas, and identity in Cognitive Socio-linguistics: A case study on definite article reduction. In: Cognitive Linguistics. 22 (1), 25-54.
Crossref
Google Scholar
JACKENDOFF, R. (1997), Twistin’ the night away. In: Language. 73 (3), 534-559.
Crossref
Google Scholar
JOHNSON, M. (1987), The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago.
Crossref
Google Scholar
KUHLMANN, M. (2013), Mildly Non-Projective Dependency Grammar. In: Computational Linguistics. 39 (2), 355-387.
Crossref
Google Scholar
LAKOFF, G. (1987), Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago – London.
Crossref
Google Scholar
LANGACKER, R. (2008), Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford.
Crossref
Google Scholar
LITOSSELITI, L. (ed.) (2018), Research Methods in Linguistics. London.
Crossref
Google Scholar
MOORE, E. (1995), Moral reasoning: an Indian case study. In: Ethos. 23 (3), 286-327.
Crossref
Google Scholar
PEREPLYOTCHIK, D. (2016), Representations in language processing: why comprehension is not “brute-causal”. In: Philosophical Psychology. 29 (2), 277-291.
Crossref
Google Scholar
PERLMUTTER, D. M. (1982), Syntactic representation, syntactic levels, and the notion of subject. In: Jacobson, P. | Pullum, G. K. (eds.), The Nature of Syntactic Representation. Dordrecht etc., 283-340.
Crossref
Google Scholar
RAMA, T. | KOLACHINA, S. | LAKSHMI BAI, B. (2009), Quantitative methods for phylogenetic inference in historical linguistics: An experimental case study ofsouth central Dravidian. In: Indian Linguistics. 70. Google Scholar
SAAB, A. (2014), Syntax or Nothing: some Theoretical and Empirical Remarks on Im-plicit Arguments. In: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics. 3 (2), 125-183.
Crossref
Google Scholar
SEGURA-BEDMAR, I. | COLÓN-RUIZ, C. | MARTÍNEZ, P. (2017), LABDA at SemEval-2017 Task 10: Extracting Keyphrases from Scientific Publications by combining the BANNER tool and the UMLS Semantic Net-work. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2017). Vancouver, 947-950.
Crossref
Google Scholar
VALIN, R. D. VAN | LAPOLLA, R. J. (1997/2004), Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge.
Crossref
Google Scholar
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
Inne teksty tego samego autora
- Aleksander Kiklewicz, О конъюнктивном употреблении разделительных союзов (на материале польского и русского языков) , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Tom 12 Nr 2 (2021): Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski
- Aleksander Kiklewicz, Pragmatic aspects of street protests discourse (on the example of protests in Belarus in 2020) , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Tom 13 Nr 2 (2022): Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski
- Aleksander Kiklewicz, Julia Mazurkiewicz-Sułkowska, Helena Pociechina, Art in protest discourses – on the example of the Belarusian anti-government protest movement , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Tom 14 Nr 2 (2023): Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski
- Aleksander Kiklewicz, Anatoliy Zahnitko, Szyk modyfikatorów wskazujących we współczesnym języku polskim i ukraińskim , Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski: Tom 15 Nr 1 (2024): Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski