“Directionality and productivity of backderivation as a synchronic and diachronic process: dictionary and corpus analysis”.
Grzegorz Wlaźlak
Politechnika ŚląskaAbstract
Backderivation is an example of a non-affixative word-forming process in which an affix is removed to create a semantically corresponding verb (Bauer, Lieber, Plague 2013: 280). This common phenomenon in English mostly occurs in the area of lexis borrowed from classical languages. The author focuses on directionality as a diachronic problem, and productivity of the process in a synchronic perspective. In order to trace the phenomenon of directionality, material from the source languages is collected chronologically. As for the phenomenon of productivity, quantitative analysis bases on attestations in text corpora and dictionaries. The author examines occurrences of this mechanism and its influence on the creation of similar forms in scientific and specialist language.
Keywords:
back-derivation, directionality, productivity, orpus analysisReferences
Adams Valerie. 2001. Complex Words in English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Bauer Laurie. 1983. English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bauer Laurie, Lieber Rochelle, Plag Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dietz Karl. 2012. “Foreign Word-formation in English”, In: P. Mueller et al. 2015. Word- formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1637–1660.
Dixon Robert. 2014. Making New Words. Morphological Derivation in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dressler Wolfgang. 2005. “Word-formation in Natural Morphology”. In: Pavol Štekauer and Rochelle Lieber (eds.), Handbook of Word-Formation, 267−244. Dordrecht: Springer.
Dressler Wolfgang, Willi Mayerthaler, Oswald Panagl and Wolfgang Wurzel. 1987. Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Hall, Robert.
Durkin Peter. 2014. Borrowed Words. A History of Loanwords in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Görlach Manfred. 2001. Eighteenth-Century English. Heilderberg: Universitätsverlag C.Winter.
Haugen Eugen. 1950. “The analysis of Linguistic Borrowing”. In: Language (26)/2, pp. 210–231.
Huddleston Rodney, Pullum Geoffrey. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kastovsky Dieter. 2009. Diachronic perspectives. In: Rochelle Lieber and Pavol Štekauer, (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, 323−342. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Koshiishi Tetsuya. 2002. “Collateral adjectives, Latinate vocabulary and English morphology”. In: Studia Anglica Posnanesia, 37, pp. 49–88.
Langacker Ronald. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mańczak-Wohlfeld Elżbieta. 1995. Tendencje rozwojowe współczesnych zapożyczeń angielskich w języku polskim. Kraków: Universitas.
Marchand Hans. 1960. Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-formation. München: Beck.
Mayerthaler Willi. 1981. Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.
OED. 1989. Oxford English Dictionary, Second Edition (2009). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pennanen Esko. 1966. Contributions to the Study of Back-Formation in English. Acta Academiae Socialis Ser. A, vol. 4 (Vammala 1966). Tampere.
Rainer Franz. 2004. “From Latin to French”. In: Booij, G., Lehmann, Ch., Mugdan, J., Stavros, S. (Eds.), Morphology. An International Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation. Vol. 2, pp. 1698–1712. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
Štekauer Pavol, Salvador Valera and Lívia Körtvélyessy. 2012. Word-Formation in the World’s Languages. A Typological Survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Szymanek Bogdan. 1989. Introduction to Morphological Analysis. Warszawa: PWN.
Waszakowa Krystyna. 1994. Słowotwórstwo współczesnego języka polskiego. Rzeczowniki sufiksalne obce. Warszawa: PWN.
Bauer Laurie. 1983. English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bauer Laurie, Lieber Rochelle, Plag Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dietz Karl. 2012. “Foreign Word-formation in English”, In: P. Mueller et al. 2015. Word- formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1637–1660.
Dixon Robert. 2014. Making New Words. Morphological Derivation in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dressler Wolfgang. 2005. “Word-formation in Natural Morphology”. In: Pavol Štekauer and Rochelle Lieber (eds.), Handbook of Word-Formation, 267−244. Dordrecht: Springer.
Dressler Wolfgang, Willi Mayerthaler, Oswald Panagl and Wolfgang Wurzel. 1987. Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Hall, Robert.
Durkin Peter. 2014. Borrowed Words. A History of Loanwords in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Görlach Manfred. 2001. Eighteenth-Century English. Heilderberg: Universitätsverlag C.Winter.
Haugen Eugen. 1950. “The analysis of Linguistic Borrowing”. In: Language (26)/2, pp. 210–231.
Huddleston Rodney, Pullum Geoffrey. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kastovsky Dieter. 2009. Diachronic perspectives. In: Rochelle Lieber and Pavol Štekauer, (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, 323−342. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Koshiishi Tetsuya. 2002. “Collateral adjectives, Latinate vocabulary and English morphology”. In: Studia Anglica Posnanesia, 37, pp. 49–88.
Langacker Ronald. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mańczak-Wohlfeld Elżbieta. 1995. Tendencje rozwojowe współczesnych zapożyczeń angielskich w języku polskim. Kraków: Universitas.
Marchand Hans. 1960. Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-formation. München: Beck.
Mayerthaler Willi. 1981. Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.
OED. 1989. Oxford English Dictionary, Second Edition (2009). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pennanen Esko. 1966. Contributions to the Study of Back-Formation in English. Acta Academiae Socialis Ser. A, vol. 4 (Vammala 1966). Tampere.
Rainer Franz. 2004. “From Latin to French”. In: Booij, G., Lehmann, Ch., Mugdan, J., Stavros, S. (Eds.), Morphology. An International Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation. Vol. 2, pp. 1698–1712. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
Štekauer Pavol, Salvador Valera and Lívia Körtvélyessy. 2012. Word-Formation in the World’s Languages. A Typological Survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Szymanek Bogdan. 1989. Introduction to Morphological Analysis. Warszawa: PWN.
Waszakowa Krystyna. 1994. Słowotwórstwo współczesnego języka polskiego. Rzeczowniki sufiksalne obce. Warszawa: PWN.
Wlaźlak, G. (2022). “Directionality and productivity of backderivation as a synchronic and diachronic process: dictionary and corpus analysis”. Acta Neophilologica, 1(XXIV), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.31648/an.6443
Grzegorz Wlaźlak
Politechnika Śląska
Politechnika Śląska
Similar Articles
- Piotr Aleksander Owsiński, An entry in a Russian Liber Copulatorum (1868-1882) in the light of a textlinguistic-codicological research , Acta Neophilologica: Vol. 1 No. XXIV (2022): Acta Neophilologica
- Tamara Morris, Carrying the Torch of Faith and Mother Tongue: An Oregonian Old Believer’s Paths of Faith , Acta Neophilologica: Vol. 1 No. XXIV (2022): Acta Neophilologica
- Małgorzata Haładewicz-Grzelak, SHIFTING COGNITIVE FRAMES IN POLISH RADIO COMMERCIALS , Acta Neophilologica: No. XII (2010): Acta Neophilologica
- Teresa Pluskota, THE INFLUENCE OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGE ON THE ONOMASTIC SYSTEM OF THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX PARISH IN BIAŁOWIEŻA AT THE TURN OF THE 19TH AND 20TH CENTURIES AND IN THE INTERWAR PERIOD (BASED ON ENTRIES IN REGISTERS OF CERTIFICATES) , Acta Neophilologica: Vol. 2 No. XVII (2015): Acta Neophilologica
- Tatiana Kwiatkowska, GRAMMATICAL CATEGORY OF NUMBER IN WORDS OF FOREIGN ORIGIN FROM THE COMPARATIVE POLISH-RUSSIAN PERSPECTIVE , Acta Neophilologica: Vol. 2 No. XVII (2015): Acta Neophilologica
- Мария Калениченко, MODAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SEMANTIC STRUCTURE OF IMPERSONAL SENTENCES IN THE CZECH LANGUAGE , Acta Neophilologica: Vol. 2 No. XVII (2015): Acta Neophilologica
- Михаил Дымарский, Connection and Innection as Basic Criteria of Linguistic Structures Organizing , Acta Neophilologica: No. XII (2010): Acta Neophilologica
- Olga Letka-Spychała, Metaphorical Description of Sacred and Profane in the Inna Lisnyanskaya’s Poetry on the Basis of the Cycles Jerusalimskaya tetrad’ and Wprigorodie Sodoma (Cognitive Apprehension) , Acta Neophilologica: No. XIII (2011): Acta Neophilologica
- Joanna Orzechowska, Content Analysis of Sinodik from Wojnowo , Acta Neophilologica: No. XIII (2011): Acta Neophilologica
- Elena Koriakowcewa, On Semantic Development of the Concept SCANDALand its Derivative Markers in Modern Russian and Polish Languages , Acta Neophilologica: Vol. 2 No. XXII (2020): Acta Neophilologica
<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
