L'inégalité face aux principes publics

Emmanuel Picavet

doi:10.31648/hip.1385

Published: 2018-10-071

No. 13 (2007)

Inequality in Face of Public Principles

Emmanuel Picavet

Humanities and Natural Sciences

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.31648/hip.1385

Abstract

Realization of moral values in public life is very problematical. One doesn't know if one can keep the laws in the same manner (in equal degree) in all possible cases. Is democracy - in connexion with it - fully democratic? Is it possible to suppress social inequalities? Who is right: J. Rawls or J. Benoist? N. Luhmann or J. Lyotard? How can more just society be established? By means of conflict or of dialogue, of consensus or of dissension?

Keywords:

inequality, justice, ethical pluralism, interest, , legitimacy of legal system, fundamental laws, naturalization of the inequality, liberal neutrality, prescriptive relativism, equality of chances, ethical segmentation, pluralistic society

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Emmanuel Picavet, Formal power and real authority: the involvement of governance norms or principles , Humanities and Natural Sciences: No. 19 (2013)
Emmanuel Picavet, Observations on G.A. Cohen’s Critical Reading of J. Rawls , Humanities and Natural Sciences: No. 21 (2015)
Emmanuel Picavet, From Kant to kelsen: the Formal Side of the Theory of the Law , Humanities and Natural Sciences: No. 14 (2008)
Emmanuel Picavet, Practical Rationalism and the Construction o f the Decision’s Context , Humanities and Natural Sciences: No. 13 (2007)
Emmanuel Picavet, Inequality in Face of Public Principles , Humanities and Natural Sciences: No. 12 (2006)
Luc Foisneau, Terry Macdonald, Emmanuel Picavet, “Good Governance” and Democracy: Competing or Complementary Models of Global Political Legitimacy? Introduction: Lessons from a Workshop on “Good Governance ” and Democracy , Humanities and Natural Sciences: No. 19 (2013)
Emmanuel Picavet, The rationality of political decisions tested by the crisis , Humanities and Natural Sciences: No. 28 (2022)

Download files

PDF (Français (France))

Citation rules

Picavet, E. (2018). Inequality in Face of Public Principles. Humanities and Natural Sciences, (13), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.31648/hip.1385

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

ent: P. Valadier, Morale en desordre. Un plaidoyer pour l ’humanite, Seuil, Paris 2002

D. Weinstock, Le pluralisme axiologique en philosophie politique contemporaine, (in:) Diversite humaine. Democratie, multiculturalisme et citoyennete, L’Harmattan et Saint-Nicolas, Les Presses de l’Universite Laval, Paris 2002

A. L. Kalleberg et L. M. Preston, Normative Political Analysis and the Problem of Justification: The Cognitive Status of Basic Political Norms, “The Journal of Politics” 1975

A. Lalande, Petit catechisme de morale pratique, «Bulletin de la societe franęaise de philosophie», Seance du 29 novembre 1906

M. Fleurbaey, «Social Choice and Just Intitutions: New Perspectives

Ch. Arnsperger, Le bien commun comme compromis social: deux conceptions de la negociation politique, «Ethique publique (revue international d’ethique societale et gouvernementale)» 2004

Ch. Arnsperger et E. Picavet, More than modus vivendi, less than overlapping consensus: Towards a political theory of social compromise, «Social Science Information / Information sur les sciences sociales», 2004

Ch. Arnsperger et E. Picavet, More than modus vivendi, less than overlapping consensus: Towards a political theory of social compromise, «Social Science Information / Information sur les sciences sociales», 2004

E. Picavet, Les principes politiques generaux face a l ’analyse de la decision et de la coordination, (in:) L. Chevalier (dir.), Le Politique et ses normes, Rennes, Presses de l’Universite de Rennes, 2006

E. Picavet, La doctrine de Rawls et le pluralisme comme modus vivendi, «Revue internationale de philosophie» 2006

Richard Bellamy, Liberalism and Pluralism. Towards a Politics of Compromise, Routledge, Londres et New York 1999

J. Benoist, La revendication comme lieu de verite du desequilibre social (misere de la philosophie politique), «Futur anterieur» 1997

M. Polanyi, The Logic of Liberty (The University of Chicago Press, 1951), tr. fr. La Logique de la liberte (PUF, Paris 1989)

H. Sakamoto, A Challenge to the Concepts of Human Rights and Human Dignity from the Philosophical Viewpoint of Global Bioethics, «Journal international de bioethique» 2002

C. Seidl, Foundations and Implications of Rights, (in:) K.J. Arrow, A. Sen et K. Suzumura (dir.), Social Choice Reexamined, MacMillan, Londres 1996

Das Wesen liberaler Rechte, (in:) C. Ott et H.-B. Schafer (dir.), Effiziente Verhaltensteuerung und Kooperation im Zivilrecht (Beitrage zum V. Travemunder Symposium zur okonomischen Analyse des Rechts, Mohr Siebeck, 1996 Google Scholar