Wpływ sztucznej inteligencji na system prawny
Nataliia Martsenko
Ternopil National Economic UniversityAbstract
W związku z niezwykle szybkim rozwojem technologii i sztucznej inteligencji zachodzą zmiany w stosunkach cywilnoprawnych i ich regulacji prawnej. Prawnicy i ustawodawcy próbują rozwiązywać nowe problemy stojące przed systemem prawnym, stosując klasyczne podejścia w regulacji prawnej. Jednak takie decyzje nie zawsze są skuteczne. Z jednej strony prawnicy dążą do szczegółowego uregulowania mechanizmu tworzenia i wykorzystania sztucznej inteligencji. Z drugiej strony państwo przyczynia się do ich rozwoju, aby wygrać światowy wyścig o najbardziej zaawansowane technologie. Problemem jest też to, jakie miejsce powinna zajmować w prawie sztuczna inteligencja. Czy jest to przedmiot lub podmiot prawa (osoba, podmiot)? Zagadnienia te mają charakter filozoficzny i wymagają szczegółowych badań. Autorka przedstawia swoje przemyślenia na temat rozwiązania tego problemu. W artykule omówiono cechy interakcji między prawem a sztuczną inteligencją, reżim prawny
sztucznej inteligencji oraz zagrożenia, które pojawiają się w przypadku zajmowania się miejscem sztucznej inteligencji w prawie. Zdaniem autorki prawo powinno znaleźć odpowiednie praktyczne sposoby budowania cyfrowego świata. Nie muszą to być konkretne zasady postępowania. Prawa sztucznej inteligencji mogą być tak abstrakcyjne, jak i skuteczne, jak to tylko możliwe. Ważne, aby sztuczna inteligencja służyła wzmacnianiu ludzkiej godności, a nie jej eliminowaniu.
Keywords:
artificial intelligence, legal system, civil law, legal personality, the object of law, subject of law (person)References
Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics, V. 10. 1137b, 12–29. Google Scholar
Artificial intelligence, English Oxford Dictionaries, https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/artificial_intelligence. Google Scholar
Artificial Intelligence: A Rising Star of Mobile Technology, 5 October 2016, https://blog.intuz.com/artificial-intelligence-a-rising-star-of-mobile-technology/. Google Scholar
Baranov O.A., Internet rechei i shtuchnyi intelekt: vytoky problemy pravovoho rehuliuvannia [The Internet of Things and artificial intelligence: the origins of the problem of legal regulation], IT-pravo: problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku v Ukraini: zbirnyk materialiv II-yi Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (Lviv, 17 lystopada 2017 r.), NU «Lvivska politekhnika», Lviv 2017, http://aphd.ua/publication-377/. Google Scholar
Bayern S., Burri T., Grant T.D., Häusermann D.M., Möslein F., Williams R., Company Law and Autonomous Systems: A Blueprint for Lawyers, Entrepreneurs, and Regulators, “Hastings Sci. & Tech. L.J.” 2017, vol. 9(135), https://repository.uchastings. Google Scholar
edu/hastings_ science_technology_law_journal/vol9/iss2/1. Google Scholar
Bostrom N., How long before superintelligence?, Oxford Future of Humanity Institute, Google Scholar
University of Oxford, originally published in “International Journal of Future Studies” 1998, vol. 2, https://nickbostrom.com/superintelligence.html. Google Scholar
Brooke H., Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence and the Law. Lecture for BAILII Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, London Lord Sales, Justice of the UK Supreme Court, 12 Google Scholar
November 2019, https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-191112.pdf. Google Scholar
Bull M., On Mercy, Princeton University Press, 2019. Google Scholar
Burkeman O., Why can’t the world’s greatest minds solve the mystery of consciousness?, Google Scholar
January 2015, https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/jan/21/-sp-why-cantworlds-greatest-minds-solve-mystery-consciousness. Google Scholar
Chen J., Burgess P., The boundaries of legal personhood: how spontaneous intelligence Google Scholar
can problematise differences between humans, artificial intelligence, companies and Google Scholar
animals, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-018-9229-x. Google Scholar
Chopra S., Laurence F., White A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents, University of Michigan Press, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.356801. Google Scholar
Copeland B.J., Artificial intelligence (AI), 12 January 2017, https://www.britannica. Google Scholar
com/technology/artificial-intelligence. Google Scholar
Čerka P., Grigienė J., Sirbikytė G., Liability for damages caused by artificial intelligence, “Computer Law & Security Review” 2015, vol. 31(3), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2015.03.008. Google Scholar
De Caria R., The Legal Meaning of Smart Contracts, “European Review of Private Law” 2019, no. 6, https://iris.unito.it/retrieve/handle/2318/1651566/464500/R.%20de%20Caria2c%20The%20Legal%20Meaning%20of%20Smart%20Contracts%2c%20ERPL_26_0602.pdf. Google Scholar
Dobbs D.B., The Law of Torts, Hornbook series Practitioner treatise series, West Group, 2001. Google Scholar
ETHICS GUIDELINES FOR TRUSTWORTHY AI, https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai. Google Scholar
Financial Stability Board, Artificial Intelligence and machine learning in financial services, 1 November 2017, https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/P011117.pdf. Google Scholar
Floridi L., Taddeo M., Turilli M., Turing’s imitation game: still an impossible challenge Google Scholar
for all machines and some judges – an evaluation of the 2008 Loebner contest, “Minds Google Scholar
and Machines” 2009, vol. 19(1), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-008-9130-6. Google Scholar
Giliker P., Vicarious Liability in Tort: A Comparative Perspective, “Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law” 2010, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779008. Google Scholar
Gunning D., Aha D.W., DARPA’s Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Program, “AI Magazine” 2019, vol. 40(2), https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v40i2.2850. Google Scholar
G20 Ministerial Statement on Trade and Digital Economy, https://trade.ec.europa.eu/ Google Scholar
doclib/docs/2019/june/tradoc_157920.pdf. Google Scholar
Heric M., Goldman N., Corporate Legal Eagles Start to Embrace Artificial Intelligence, Google Scholar
“Bain & Company Brief” 2019, https://www.bain.com/contentassets/89762 Google Scholar
d77cb0241 39a224cade94a1a00e/bain-brief_digital-in-legal.pdf. Google Scholar
Hodge L., Law and technological change, British Irish Commercial Bar Association Google Scholar
Signet Library, Edinburgh, Justice of The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, Google Scholar
April 2019, https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-190404.pdf. Google Scholar
Hubbard F.P., Sophisticated Robots’: Balancing Liability, Regulation, and Innovation, Google Scholar
“Florida Law Review” 2014, vol. 66(1803), https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi ?article=2027&context=law_facpub. Google Scholar
Janal R., Die deliktische Haftung beim Einsatz von Robotern – Lehren aus der Haftung Google Scholar
für Sachen und Gehilfen, “Gless/Seelmann, Intelligente Agenten und das Recht” Google Scholar
, vol. 141, https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845280066. Google Scholar
Kosse D.D., Pravovyi rezhym ta mekhanizm pravovoho rehuliuvannia: oznaky ta spivvidnoshennia (Legal regime and mechanism of legal regulation: signs and correlations), “Derzhava i pravo” 2009, vyp. 44. Google Scholar
Lea G., The Struggle To Define What Artificial Intelligence Actually Means, 3 September 2015. Google Scholar
Lehmann-Wilzig S.N., Frankenstein Unbound – Towards a legal definition of Artificial ntelligence, “Futures” 1981, vol. 442, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(81)90100-2. Google Scholar
Lenardon J.P.A., The regulation of artificial intelligence, Tilburg University, Tilburg 2017, http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=142832. Google Scholar
Leroux Ch., Labruto R., Boscarato Ch., Caroleo F., Günther J-P. et al., Suggestion For A Green Paper on Legal Issues in Robotics, Grant Agreement. Number: 248552, public report, December 2012, https://www.unipv-lawtech.eu/files/euRobotics-legal-issues-in-robotics-DRAFT_6j6ryjyp.pdf. Google Scholar
Opitz P., Civil Liability and Autonomous Robotic Machines: Approaches in the EU and US, “Stanford-Vienna TTLF Working Paper”, no. 43, http://ttlf.stanford.edu, https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/opitz_wp43.pdf. Google Scholar
Pidruchnyk dlia studentiv yurydychnykh fakultetiv [Textbook for law students], 5-te vyd. pererob. ta dop. K.: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury, 2015. Google Scholar
Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence, https://www.fsmb.org/siteassets /artificial-intelligence/pdfs/oecd-recommendation-on-ai-en.pdf. Google Scholar
Runciman D., How Democracy Ends, Profile Books Ltd., 2018. Google Scholar
Smith A., Artificial intelligence, 2015, http://nationalmagazine.ca/Articles/Fall-Issue2015/Artificial-intelligence.aspx. Google Scholar
Susskind R., Susskind D., The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts, OUP 2015, 16, https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X693377. Google Scholar
Urban T., The AI Revolution: The Road to Superintelligence, 22 January 2015, https://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-2.html. Google Scholar
Veith Ch. et al., How Legal Technology Will Change the Business of Law, January 2016, https://issuu.com/jeroenzweers/docs/legal_tech_report_2016. Google Scholar
Weaver J.F., Robots Are People Too: How Siri, Google Car, and Artificial Intelligence Will Force Us to Change Our Laws, 26 November 2013, https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-6140. Google Scholar
Williams J., Stand out of our Light, Cambridge University Press, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108453004. Google Scholar
Wilks Y., Responsible Computers?, IJCAI’85: Proceedings of the 9th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence, August 1985, vol. 2. Google Scholar
Ternopil National Economic University
