Approving gloss on the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of November 18, 2021 (ref. no. I OSK 4193/21) to the extent that bearing responsibility for the violation of public finance discipline is a feature that proves the performance of a public function within the meaning of Art. 5 sec. 2 of the Act on Access to Public Information
Piotr Sitniewski
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w OlsztynieAbstract
The aim of the gloss is to assess selected features that prove the performance of a public function in the context of the right to information. The subject of the commentary is the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of November 18, 2012, in which the Supreme Administrative Court assumed that the fact of performing a function related to incurring responsibility for the violation of public finance discipline also results in recognizing
these persons as persons performing public functions within the meaning of the right to public information. Therefore, the documents being the subject of the application should not be anonymised.
Keywords:
administrative law, access to public information, performance of a public function, violation of public finance discipline, public financeReferences
Bidziński M., Chmaj M., Szustakiewicz P., Ustawa o dostępie do informacji publicznej. Google Scholar
Komentarz, wyd. trzecie, C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2018. Google Scholar
Misiąg W., Ustawa o odpowiedzialności za naruszenie dyscypliny finansów publicznych, [w:] W. Misiąg (red.), Ustawa o finansach publicznych. Ustawa o odpowiedzialności za naruszenie dyscypliny finansów publicznych. Komentarz, wyd. trzecie, C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2019. Google Scholar
Sitniewski P., Kim jest osoba pełniąca funkcję publiczną, „Informacja w Administracji” 2017, nr 3. Google Scholar
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie
