Polish citizen’s right to court in criminal matters
Teresa Gardocka
Uniwersytet SWPSDariusz Jagiełło
Uniwersytet SWPSAbstract
The purpose of this paper is to determine the scope of the right to a national court that a Polish citizen accused of a crime enjoys. The problem, of course, is when the accused is on Polish territory and another country has made a formal request to surrender him or her for trial. The introduction of the European Arrest Warrant and the related amendment of Article 55 of the Polish Constitution has meant that the traditional prohibition on the surren-
der of nationals, which was once seen as a guarantee of the defendant’s right to a national trial, no longer applies. This was considered one of the rights associated with citizenship. The conclusion of our considerations is as follows: a Polish citizen who resides in the territory of the Republic of Poland is guaranteed the right to a Polish court if in his/her case, apart from the citizenship link, there is also a territoriality link, i.e., the crime was committed
in Polish territory. The assessment of where the crime was committed is based on Articles 5 and 6 of the Criminal Code. When these jurisdictional connectors
coincide, surrendering the perpetrator to another state is not legally permissible. The considerations undertaken in this paper are based on a dogmatic analysis of Polish law and the method of legal-historical analysis. They are
based on an assessment of the significance of constitutional provisions for the interpretation of national laws and the significance of EU law for the national
legal order of European Union member states, including an analysis of legal provisions before and after Poland’s accession to the European Union.
Keywords:
criminal proceedings, Polish citizen, jurisdiction, European arrest warrant, jurisdictional linkReferences
Baranowska G., Bodnar A., Gliszczyńska-Grabias A. (red. naukowa), Ochrona praw obywatelek i obywateli Unii Europejskiej, Wolters Kluwer 2015. Google Scholar
Cherif Bassiouni M., Ved P. Nanda (editors), A Treatise on International Criminal Law, vol. II, Jurisdiction and Cooperation, Springfield 1973. Google Scholar
Gardocka T., Jagiełło D., Europejski nakaz aresztowania wysyłany z Polski do krajów Unii Europejskiej – uwagi praktyczne, [w:] Skuteczność ekstradycji i europejskiego nakazu aresztowania, red. S. Pikulski, K. Szczechowicz, M. Romańczuk-Grącka, Olsztyn 2014. Google Scholar
Gardocka T., Jagiełło D., Glosa do postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 6 grudnia 2016 r., IV KK 192/16, „Orzecznictwo Sądów Polskich” 2018 r., nr 6. Google Scholar
Gardocka T., Jagiełło D., Glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 25 lutego 2021 r., sygn. I KZP 5/20, „Państwo i Prawo” 2022, z. 7. Google Scholar
Gardocki L., Gardocka T., Majewski Ł., Prawo karne międzynarodowe, Warszawa 2017. Google Scholar
Gardocki L., Prawo karne, wyd. 21. Warszawa 2019. Google Scholar
Górski A, Sakowicz A., Na przekór prawu UE. Implementacja europejskiego nakazu aresztowania, Analizy Natolińskie 7 (11) 2006 Google Scholar
Jagiełło D., Komentarz do Konstytucji RP. Art. 41-45, Difin 2020. Google Scholar
Knypl Z., Ekstradycja jako instytucja prawa międzynarodowego i wewnętrznego, Warszawa 1975. Google Scholar
Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, Komentarz. Tom II, wyd. II, red. L. Garlicki, M. Zubik, Wydawnictwo Sejmowe 2016 r. Google Scholar
Shearer I. A., Extradition in International Law, Manchester 1971. Google Scholar
Zięba-Załucka H., Problematyka obywatelstwa a prawa obywatelskie w Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, „Kwartalnik Prawa Publicznego” 2001, nr 1. Google Scholar
Uniwersytet SWPS
Uniwersytet SWPS
