American Progressivism: Supreme Court of the United States and the legitimization of eugenic practices

Edyta Sokalska

Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0903-7726


Abstract

The purpose of the article is the presentation of the directions of reforms and development of eugenic ideas in the Progressive Era in the United States, and the evaluation of the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in the context of eugenic practices. Progressives reached their height in the early 20th century as a response to vast industrialization, the growth of large corporations, and the fears of corruption in American politics. The second half of the Progressive Era brought many statutory victories by the progressive economists and their proponents. Their reforms included state laws that regulated working conditions, fixed minimum wages, determined working hours, and banned child labour. Eugenic views justified exclusionary immigration legislation, and economists affiliated with the American Association for Labor Legislation advocating labour reforms were under the influence of ‘race-suicide’ theories. The jurisprudence of the U.S. Supreme Court profoundly influenced the shape of the legal order in economic and labour law. Some decisions reflected the ideological attitudes of the justices rather than an aspiration for reform. The effect of the ruling in Buck v. Bell was the legitimization of eugenic practices in the United States. The case was also a classic example of an individual’s right versus state’s rights to control reproduction.


Keywords:

Supreme Court of the United States, constituional law, judicature, Progressive Era, sterilization, eugenics


Barret D., Kurzman C., Globalizing Social Movement Theory: The Case of Eugenics, “Theory and Society” 2004, vol. 33, no. 5.   Google Scholar

Beeby J.M., Ingrassia B.M., Precursors to Gilded Age and Progressive era Reforms, [in:] A Companion to the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, eds. C. McKnight Nichols, N.C. Unger, Wiley Blackwell, Malden-Oxford 2017.   Google Scholar

Binnebesel J., Baczała D., Błajet P., Eugenika – aspekty historyczne, biologiczne i edukacyjne, “Studia Edukacyjne” 2019, vol. 52, DOI: 10.14746/se.2019.52.10.   Google Scholar

Black E., Eugenics and the Nazis: The California Connection, [in:] Beyond Bioethics: Toward a New Biopolitics, eds. O.K. Obasogie, M. Darnovsky, University of California Press 2018.   Google Scholar

Broberg G., Roll-Hansen N. (eds.), Eugenics and Welfare State: Sterilization Policy in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland, East Lansing, Michigan 1996.   Google Scholar

Corber R.J., American Eugenics: Race, Queer Anatomy, and the Science of Nationalism Nancy Ordover (Review), “The American Historical Review” 2004, vol. 109, no. 4.   Google Scholar

Dikötter F., Race Culture: Recent Perspectives on the History of Eugenics, “The American Historical Review” 1998, vol. 103, no. 2.   Google Scholar

Dorr G.M., Defective or Disabled?: Race, Medicine, and Eugenics in Progressive Era Virginia and Alabama, “The Journal of Gilded Age and Progressive Era” 2006, vol. 5, no. 4.   Google Scholar

Dorr G.M., Segregation’s Science: Eugenics and Society in Virginia, Charlottesville-London 2008.   Google Scholar

Edwards R., New Spirits: Americans in the “Gilded Age” 1865–1905, 2nd edn., Oxford University Press, Oxford-New York 2011.   Google Scholar

Edwards R., Politics, Social Movements, and the Periodization of U.S. History, “The Journal of Gilded Age and Progressive Era” 2009, vol. 8, no. 4.   Google Scholar

Field J.A., The Progress of Eugenics, “The Quarterly Journal of Economics” 1911, vol. 26, no. 1.   Google Scholar

Freeden M., Liberal Languages: Ideological Imaginations and Twentieth-Century Progressive Thought, Princeton University Press 2005.   Google Scholar

Friedman B., The Will of the People. How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning of the Constitution, Farrar Straus & Giroux, New York 2009.   Google Scholar

Galton F., Eugenics: Its Definition, Scope, and Aims, “The American Journal of Sociology” 1905, vol. 10, no. 1.   Google Scholar

Gendzel G., What the Progressives Had in Common, “The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era” 2011, vol. 10, no. 3, DOI: 10.1017/S15377811411000089.   Google Scholar

Glenna L.L., Gollnick M.A., Jones S.S., Eugenics Opportunity Structures: Teaching Genetic Engineering at U.S. Land-Grant Universities Since 1911, “Social Studies of Science” 2007, vol. 37, no. 2.   Google Scholar

Gould L.L., America in the Progressive Era, 1890-1914, Routledge, London-New York 2013, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315839479.   Google Scholar

Górski G., Sąd Najwyższy Stanów Zjednoczonych do 1930 roku, Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin 2006.   Google Scholar

Grantham D. W., The Contours of Southern Progressivism, “The American Historical Review” 1981, vol. 86, no. 5.   Google Scholar

Hogan J.M. (ed.), Rhetoric and reform in the Progressive Era, Michigan State University Press, East Lansing 2003.   Google Scholar

Johnston R., Influential Works about the Gilded and Progressive Era, [in:] A Companion to the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, eds. C. McKnight Nichols, N.C. Unger, Wiley Blackwell, Malden-Oxford 2017.   Google Scholar

Leonard T.C., Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era, Princeton University Press 2016.   Google Scholar

Leonard T.C., More Merciful and Not Less Effective: Eugenics and Progressive Era American Economics, “History of Political Economy” 2003, vol. 35(4).   Google Scholar

Leonard T.C., Protecting Family and Race: The Progressive Case for Regulating Women’s work, “American Journal of Economics and Sociology” 2005, vol. 64(3).   Google Scholar

Leonard T.C., Retrospectives: Eugenics and Economics in the Progressive Era, “The Journal of Economic Perspectives” 2005, vol. 19, no. 4.   Google Scholar

Link A.S., What Happened to the Progressive Movement in the 1920s?, “The American Historical Review” 1959, vol. 64, no. 4.   Google Scholar

Lombardo, P.A., Three Generations, no Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme court, and Buck v. Bell, Johns Hopkins University Press 2008.   Google Scholar

Lombardo, P.A., Three Generations, no Imbeciles: new Light on Buck v. Bell, “New York University Law Review” 1985, vol. 60 (30).   Google Scholar

Machaj Ł, Buck versus Bell czyli eugenika w sadzie Najwyższym Stanów Zjednoczonych, “Studia nad Faszyzmem i Zbrodniami Hitlerowskimi” 2009, vol. 31.   Google Scholar

Nye R B., Midwestern Progressive Politics: A Historical Study of its Origins and Development, 1870-1958, Harper & Row, East Lansing 1959.   Google Scholar

Oberman M., Thirteen Ways of Looking at Buck v. bell: Thoughts Occasioned by Paul Lombardo’s “Three Generations, No Imbeciles, “Journal of Legal Education” 2010, vol. 59 (3).   Google Scholar

Ordover N., American Eugenics: Race, Queer Anatomy, and the Science of Nationalism, University of Minnesota Press, Minnesota 2003.   Google Scholar

Orloff A. S., Skocpol T., Why not Equal Protection? Explaining the Politics of Public Social Spending in Britain, 1900-1911, and the United States, 1880-1920, “American Sociological Review” 1984, vol. 49, no. 6.   Google Scholar

Perry E.I., Men Are from the Gilded Age, Women Are from the Progressive Era, “The Journal of Gilded Age and Progressive Era” 2002, vol. 1, no. 1, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537781400000086.   Google Scholar

Rehnquist W.H., The Supreme Court. Revisited and Updated, Knopf, New York 2001.   Google Scholar

Rodgers D.T., In search of Progressivism, „Reviews in American History” 1982, vol. 10, no. 4, The Promise of American History: Progress and Prospects.   Google Scholar

Ruiz G.W., The Ideological Convergence of Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, “Presidential Studies Quarterly”1989, vol. 19, No. 1, Part 1: American Foreign Policy for the 1990s and part 2: Wilson and the Progressive Era.   Google Scholar

Sanders E., Roots of Reforms: Farmers, Workers, and the American State 1877-1917, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1999.   Google Scholar

Sokalska E., American Progressivism and the Issue of Women’s Rights (Some Remarks Concerning the Influence of Feminist Currents on the American Constitutionalism), [in:] Women, Society and Law: From Roman Law to Digital Age, eds. M. Eysymontt, C. Lázaro Guillamón, Dom Wydawniczy ELIPSA, Warszawa 2022.   Google Scholar

Sokalska E., Searching for Progress: Progressivism and the U.S. Supreme Court Jurisprudence (some remarks), “Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego” 2020, vol. 5 (57), doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2020.05.33.   Google Scholar

Sokalska E., The U.S. Supreme Court and the Establishment of the ‘Separate but Equal Doctrine’, [in:] Contemporary Problems of Human Rights Selected Aspects, eds. M. Mamiński, M. Rzewuski,Wydawnictwo Naukowe UKSW, Warszawa 2019.   Google Scholar

Soloway R.A., Demography and Degeneration: Eugenics and the Declining Birthrate in Twentieth -Century Britain, University of North Carolina Press 1995.   Google Scholar

Soloway R.A., The ‘Perfect Contraceptive’ Eugenics and Birth Control Research in Britain and America in the Interwar Years, “Journal of Contemporary History” 1995, vol. 30, no. 4.   Google Scholar

Stern A.M., Eugenic Nation: Faults and Frontiers of Better Breeding in Modern America, University of California Press 2016.   Google Scholar

Stone D., Breeding Superman, Nietzsche, Race and Eugenics in Edwardian and Interwar Britain, Liverpool University Press 2002.   Google Scholar

Stromquist S., Reinventing “The People”: The Progressive Movement, the Class Problem, and the Origins of Modern Liberalism, University of Illinois Press, Urbana-Chicago 2006.   Google Scholar

Thelen D.P., Social Tensions and the Origins of Progressivism, “The Journal of American History” 1969, vol. 56, no. 2.   Google Scholar

Wiebe R.H., The Search for Order, 1877-1929, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York 1967.   Google Scholar

Yudell M., Race Unmasked: Biology and Race in the Twentieth Century, Columbia University Press 2014.   Google Scholar

CASE LAW   Google Scholar

Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927).   Google Scholar

Chae Chan Ping v. United States, 130 U.S. 581 (1889).   Google Scholar

Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905).   Google Scholar

Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967).   Google Scholar

Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942).   Google Scholar


Published
2023-12-20

Cited by

Sokalska, E. (2023). American Progressivism: Supreme Court of the United States and the legitimization of eugenic practices. Studia Prawnoustrojowe, (62). https://doi.org/10.31648/sp.9251

Edyta Sokalska 
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0903-7726