Anthropological Dimension of Constructivism in the Culture of Presence
Olga DolskaDepartment of Philosophy, National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kirpichov st., 2, 61002, Kharkiv, Ukraine
Кандидат філософських наук, доцент кафедри філософії, Національний технічний університет "Харківський політехнічний інститут"
Jakov TararoyevDepartment of Philosophy, National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kirpichov st., 2, 61002, Kharkiv, Ukraine
To the authors’ mind human activity is more frequently based on Constructivism in spheres as science, epistemology, education, upbringing, number of living practices, etc. The authors emphasize if such approach relies on Enlightenment rationality there are many risks and negative consequences of it using what was obviously already in 20th century. The reason is in specific comprehension of subject that influences on imperfect anthropological dimension of the rationality. Analysing of its modification has necessarily led the authors to take into account the Culture of Presence idea in the process of anthropological dimension realisation. The Culture of Presence “clears” the place for a new “intellectual surrounding” where there is a need to leave the awful Constructivism position formed through metaphysical comprehension of subject. In the article there were proposed the categories of those culture, there emphasizes their relevance in new life conditions and there was analysed the Presence phenomenon in the contemporary scientists researches. The authors underline the Culture of Presence basis and implementations of this culture contribute to disappearance of self-contained subject. In the event situation the subject could be replaced by subjectivity capable to respond, to empathize, to be responsible for others, etc. The contemporary humanities need to renew anthropological dimension inasmuch as comprehension of it cannot be guided at traditional norms of Enlightenment rationality and metaphysics discourse.
Keywords:constructivism, anthropological dimension, subject, subjectivation, culture of Presence, Presence, Enlightenment rationality
Ankersmit Franklin R., 2007, A Sublime Historical Experience, Moscow, Europe Publishing House, URL: http://abuss.narod.ru/Biblio/ankersmit/ankersmit8.htm (04.05.2017).
Badiou Alain, 2005, The Century, URL: https://ru.scribd.com/doc/177311558/Alain-Badiou-The-Century# (04.05.2017).
Badiou Аlain, 2010, Philosophy and Event. Conversations with a brief introduction to the philosophy of Alain Badiou, URL: https://www.libfox.ru/638253-alen-badyu-filosofiya-i-sobytie-besedy-s-kratkim-vvedeniem-v-filosofiyu-alena-badyu.html (04.05.2017).
Bainbridge William S., Roco Mihail C., 2005, Managing Nano-Bio-Infocogno Innovations: Converging technologies in Society, Complete Report in PDF format, World Technology Evaluation Center, URL: http://www.wtec.org/ConvergingTechnologies/3/NBIC3_report.pdf (04.05.2017).
Bainbridge William S., Roco Mihail C., 2016, Science and technology convergence: with emphasis for nanotechnology-inspired convergence, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, No 18 (7), June 2016, URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305643543_Science_and_technology_convergence_with_emphasis_for_nanotechnology-inspired_convergence (04.05.2017).
Baird Theodore, 2017, Interest groups and strategic constructivism: business actors and border security policies in the European Union, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1316185 (04.05.2017).
Berger Peter L. and Luckmann Thomas, 1966, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Brosig Malte, 2012, No Space for Constructivism? A Critical Appraisal of European Compliance Research, Perspectives on European Politics and Society Vol. 13, No. 4, p. 390–407, URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2012.731931 (04.05.2017).
Checkel Jeffrey T., 2004, Social Constructivisms in Global and European Politics, Review of International Studies, 30, pp. 229–44. // URL: https://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena-working-papers/2001-2010/2003/wp03_15.pdf (04.05.2017).
Chernikova Irina, 2011, Typology of science in the context of modern philosophy of science, Questions of philosophy, No 11, p. 71–78.
Downes Stephen, 2010, New Technology Supporting Informal Learning, Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, No.2 (1) P. 27-33. URL: https://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=51342 (24.04.2009)
Hacking Ian, 1999, The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press // URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261743764_The_Social_Construction_of_What_by_Ian_Hacking (04.05.2017).
Hay Colin, 2016, Good in a crisis: the ontological institutionalism of social constructivism, New Political Economy, URL: // http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2016.1158800 (04.05.2017).
Honcharenko Olha, 2017, Educational Contexts of Constructivism, Philosophy of Education, No. 2 (21), p. 162-168.
Gumbrecht Huns Ulrich, 2006, Presence production: What meaning cannot convey, URL: http://www.history-library.com/index.php?id1=3&category=arhiologiya&author=gumreht-hu&book=2006 (04.05.2017).
Jasiński Karol, On the Spiritual Foundation of Europe, Studia Warmińskie, The Studies of Warmia, 2018, No55, p. 25-42.
Lectorskiy Vladislav, 2007, Cognition, understanding, design. Grew up Acad. Sciences, Institute of Philosophy, IFRAN, Moscow.
Lee Kwan Min, 2004, Presence, Explicated, Communication Theory, Vol. 14, Issue 1, 2004, P. 27–50, URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x (10.01.2006).
Lombard Matthew, Ditton Theresa, 2006, At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence, URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x (23.06. 2006).
Mulkey Michael, 1983, Science and sociology of knowledge, Moscow, Progress.
Ramachamdran Vileayanur, 2006, The birth of the mind. Mysteries of our consciousness, URL:https://royallib.com/book/ramachandran_vileyanur/rogdenie_razuma_zagadki_nashego_soznaniya.html (04.05.2017).
Raskin D. Jonathan, 2017, Constructivism, Ethics, and Knowing What’s Right: A Reply to McNamee, Burr, McWilliams, Osbeck, and Held, Journal of Constructivist Psychology, URL: // https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10720537.2017.1383956 (04.05.2017).
Risse Thomas, 2000, ‘Let’s argue!’ Communicative action in international relations, International Organization, 54(1), pp. 1–39. // URL: http://rochelleterman.com/ir/sites/default/files/risse%202000.pdf (04.05.2017).
Saurugger Sabine, 2010, The Social Construction of the Participatory Turn: The Emergence of a Norm in the European Union, European Journal of Political Research 49 (4): p. 471–495.
Saurugger Sabine, 2013, Constructivism and Public Policy Approaches in the EU: From Ideas to Power Games. Journal of European Public Policy 20 (6): p. 888–906.
Searle John Rogers, 2010, Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilisation, Oxford: Oxford University Press // URL: http://www.frankfurt-school-verlag.de/rmm/downloads/Review_Buehler.pdf (04.05.2017).
Siemens George, 2005, Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. URL: http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm (04.05.2017).