Thinking the family: institutionalism versus globalism. Theoretical clarity, strange developments & huge problems
Michael Wladika
ITI Catholic University, Wien (Austria)Abstract
This text intends to show: First: There is no theoretical unclarity surrounding the notion of the family. Taken together, its spelling-out in Aristotle and St. Augustine is, as it were: perfect, intellectually completely satisfying. One could even go so far as to say that this is a truth universally acknowledged among those who know what they are talking about. This is recapitulated with a special stress on theoretical stringency. But then: There seem to be many cultured despisers of the family. The force of the zeitgeist runs strong here, and it will not simply go away. Strange developments lead to and huge problems surround and result from social atomism, anti-institutionalistic and globalistic concepts. This is developed ex negativo, against the background of robust institutionalism. Jürgen Habermas` destructive universalism e.g. can be understood via concentration on Arnold Gehlen`s institution-theory.
The text tries to lead to insight into this syllogism: Man is institutionalistic by nature. Globalism or internationalism is intrinsically anti-institutionalistic. Globalism or internationalism therefore directly leads to the abolition of man.
But, finally: Of course all this can be overcome. The way to transcend the zeitgeist-tendencies is the only necessary institution, the family. The family liberates practically, and it clarifies theoretically.
References
Arendt Hannah, 1991, Elemente und Ursprünge totaler Herrschaft, Piper, Berlin. Google Scholar
Aristotle, 1957, De anima (On the Soul), transl. W.S. Hett, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Massachu-setts) & London. Google Scholar
Aristotle, 1936, Metaphysics, transl. H. Tredennick, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts) & London. Google Scholar
Aristotle, 1982, Nicomachean Ethics, transl. H. Rackham, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Massachu-setts) & London. Google Scholar
Aristotle, 1999, Poetics, transl. St. Halliwell, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts) & London. Google Scholar
Aristotle, 1944, Politics, transl. H. Rackham, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts) & London. Google Scholar
St. Augustine, 2001, De bono coniugali. De sancta virginitate, transl. P.G. Walsh, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Crossref
Google Scholar
St. Augustine, 1957-1972, De civitate Dei, transl. G.E. McCracken, W.M. Green, et al., Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts) & London. Google Scholar
Benedict XVIth, 2006, Glaube und Vernunft. Die Regensburger Vorlesung, Herder, Freiburg im Breisgau. Google Scholar
Davies Brian OP, 1992, The Thought of Thomas Aquinas, Clarendon, Oxford.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Gehlen Arnold, 1940, Der Mensch, seine Natur und seine Stellung in der Welt, Junker & Dünnhaupt, Berlin. Google Scholar
Gehlen Arnold, 1969, Moral und Hypermoral, Athenäum, Frankfurt am Main. Google Scholar
Gehlen Arnold, 2004, Urmensch und Spätkultur, 6th ed., Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main. Google Scholar
Habermas Jürgen, 1998a, Der Zerfall der Institutionen, in: Philosophisch-politische Profile, 3rd ed., Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, p. 101-106. Google Scholar
Habermas Jürgen, 1998b, Nachgeahmte Substantialität, in: Philosophisch-politische Profile, 3rd ed., Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, p. 107-126. Google Scholar
Hume David, 1740, A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects, Thomas Longman, London. Google Scholar
McCabe Herbert OP, 2008, On Aquinas, Burns & Oates, London / New York. Google Scholar
Moore George Edward, 1903, Principia Ethica, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar
Plato, 1927, Alcibiades, transl. W.R.M. Lamb, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts) & Lon-don.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Plato, 1925, Gorgias, transl. W.R.M. Lamb, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts) & London.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Plato, 2013, Republic, transl. Chr. Emlyn-Jones & W. Preddy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Massa-chusetts) & London.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Ross David, 1995, Aristotle, 6th ed., Routledge, London / New York. Google Scholar
Schluchter Wolfgang, 1996, Individuelle Freiheit und soziale Bindung. Vom Nutzen und Nachteil der Institu-tionen für den Menschen, in: Unversöhnte Moderne, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. Google Scholar
Schnädelbach Herbert, 1986, Nachwort, in: Arnold Gehlen, Anthropologische und sozialpsychologische Unter-suchungen, Rowohlt, Reinbek bei Hamburg. Google Scholar
Spaemann Robert, 1989, Glück und Wohlwollen, Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart. Google Scholar
Wladika Michael, 2008, Moralische Weltordnung, Selbstvernichtung und Bildwerden, seeliges Leben, Königs-hausen & Neumann, Würzburg. Google Scholar
Wladika Michael, 2013, Arnold Gehlen und die Suche nach dem Kontakt mit der Wirklichkeit, in: Daniel Füh-ring (ed.), Gegen die Krise der Zeit. Konservative Denker im Portrait, Ares, Graz. Google Scholar
Wladika Michael, 2015, Das Naturrecht: Philosophische Grundlagen und Offenheit für das Übernatürliche, in: Christian Machek, Herbert Pribyl (eds.), Das Naturrecht. Quellen und Bedeutung für die Gegenwart, Be&Be, Heiligenkreuz, p. 31-49. Google Scholar
Wladika Michael, 2019, Virtues. The Aristotelian-Thomistic Line of Thinking, in: Elisa Grimi (ed.), Virtue Ethics: Retrospect and Prospect, Springer, Cham, p. 27-42.
Crossref
Google Scholar
ITI Catholic University, Wien (Austria)
