The doctrine of the margin of appreciation as a tool of relativisation of freedom of religion.
Some reflections on the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
Adam Jakuszewicz
Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w BydgoszczyAbstrakt
The objective of the paper is to determine the implications for the interpretation of Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights resulting from the Court’s affording to national authorities the wide margin of appreciation when deciding whether in a given case there is a need to limit the exercise of freedom of religion. The use of the doctrine of margin of appreciation in such cases is justified both by the lack of an all-European consensus as to the proper model of relations between the state and religious communities and by divergences of views and traditions concerning the importance and impact of religion in the society. In consequence, the Court holds that restrictions on freedom of religion on grounds of the principle of secularism, which in some
countries has a rank of a constitutional principle of the political system, are compatible with the Convention. This is the case eve where establishing a link between the restriction of this kind with any of the legitimate aims outlined in Article 9.2 of the Convention is highly disputable, if not impossible. Moreover, the excessive use of the doctrine of margin of appreciation in this context makes the protection level of freedom of religion contingent on prevailing ( not always rational and free from prejudice )views and attitudes towards some forms of manifestation of religious beliefs. This outcome, however, is difficult to reconcile with values underlying the Convention and the need for minority protection
Słowa kluczowe:
wolności i prawa człowieka, , doktryna marginesu swobody, ograniczenia wolności religii, zasada świeckości, ubiór religijny, zasada współżycia w społeczeństwie „living together”Bibliografia
Berry S., Religious Freedom and the European Court of Human Rights’ Two Margins Google Scholar
of Appreciation, “Religion and Human Rights” 2017, no. 12. Google Scholar
Brems E., S.A.S. v. France as a problematic precedent, „Strasbourg Observers”, 9 June Google Scholar
, https://strasbourgobservers.com/2014/07/09/s-a-s-v-france-as-a-problematicprecedent/. Google Scholar
Celador Angón Ó., Orígenes histórico-constitucionales del principio de la laicidad, Tirant de Blanch, Valencia 2017. Google Scholar
Du Plessis G., The European Struggle with Religious Diversity: Osmanoğlu and Kocabas – v. Switzerland, “Journal of Church and State” 2018, vol. 60(3). Google Scholar
Fernández Parra, S.A., El margen nacional de apreciación y el contenido de la libertad Google Scholar
de pensamiento, conciencia y religión en el Convenio Europeo de Derechos Humanos, Google Scholar
“Eunomía. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad” 2019, no. 17. Google Scholar
Grabenwarter Ch., European Convention on Human Rights: Commentary, C.H. Beck, Google Scholar
Munich 2014. Google Scholar
Lugato M., The “Margin of Appreciation” and Freedom of Religion: Between Treaty Interpretation and Subsidiarity, “Journal of Catholic Legal Studies” 2013, vol. 52. Google Scholar
Maclure J., Taylor C., Secularism and freedom of conscience, Harvard University Google Scholar
Press, Cambridge 2011. Google Scholar
Nowicki M.A., Wokół Konwencji Europejskiej. Komentarz do Europejskiej Konwencji Google Scholar
Praw Człowieka, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2017. Google Scholar
Shabas W.A., The European Convention on Human Rights. A Commentary, Oxford Google Scholar
University Press, Oxford 2015. Google Scholar
Sychenko E., Individual Labour Rights as Human Rights: the contributions of the European Court of Human Rights to worker’s rights protection, Kluwer Law International BV, Alphen aan den Rijn 2017. Google Scholar
Vickers L., Conform or be confined: S.A.S. v France, “Oxford Human Rights Hub”, Google Scholar
July 2014, http://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/conform-or-be-confined-s-a-s-v-france/. Google Scholar
Yusuf H., S.A.S v France: Supporting ‘Living Together or Forced Assimilation, “International Human Rights Law Review” 2014, no. 3(2), https://strathprints.strath. Google Scholar
ac.uk/49528/. Google Scholar
Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy
