Influence of artificial intelligence on the legal system

Nataliia Martsenko

Ternopil National Economic University


Due to the extremely rapid development of technologies and artificial intelligence, there are changes in civil law relations and their legal regulation. Lawyers and legislators are trying to solve the new problems facing the legal system by using classical approaches in legal regulation. However, such decisions are not always effective. On the one hand, lawyers seek to regulate in detail the mechanism of creation and use of artificial intelligence. On the other hand, the state contributes to their development intending to win the world race for the most advanced technologies. The problem is also what place the artificial intelligence in law should occupy. Is it an object or subject of law (person, an entity)? These issues are philosophical and need deep research. The author offers his thoughts on the solution to this issue. This article explores the features of the interaction between law and artificial intelligence, the legal regime of artificial intelligence, and the risks that arise when addressing the place of artificial intelligence in law.According to the authors, the law should find appropriate practical ways to build the digital world. It does not have to be specific rules of conduct. Artificial intelligence laws can be abstract enough, but as effective as possible. Artificial intelligence must be used to enhance human dignity, and not to
eliminate it.

Słowa kluczowe:

sztuczna inteligencja, system prawny, prawo cywilne, osobowość prawna, przedmiot prawa, podmiot prawa

Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics, V. 10. 1137b, 12–29.   Google Scholar

Artificial intelligence, English Oxford Dictionaries,   Google Scholar

Artificial Intelligence: A Rising Star of Mobile Technology, 5 October 2016,   Google Scholar

Baranov O.A., Internet rechei i shtuchnyi intelekt: vytoky problemy pravovoho rehuliuvannia [The Internet of Things and artificial intelligence: the origins of the problem of legal regulation], IT-pravo: problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku v Ukraini: zbirnyk materialiv II-yi Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (Lviv, 17 lystopada 2017 r.), NU «Lvivska politekhnika», Lviv 2017,   Google Scholar

Bayern S., Burri T., Grant T.D., Häusermann D.M., Möslein F., Williams R., Company Law and Autonomous Systems: A Blueprint for Lawyers, Entrepreneurs, and Regulators, “Hastings Sci. & Tech. L.J.” 2017, vol. 9(135), https://repository.uchastings.   Google Scholar

edu/hastings_ science_technology_law_journal/vol9/iss2/1.   Google Scholar

Bostrom N., How long before superintelligence?, Oxford Future of Humanity Institute,   Google Scholar

University of Oxford, originally published in “International Journal of Future Studies” 1998, vol. 2,   Google Scholar

Brooke H., Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence and the Law. Lecture for BAILII Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, London Lord Sales, Justice of the UK Supreme Court, 12   Google Scholar

November 2019,   Google Scholar

Bull M., On Mercy, Princeton University Press, 2019.   Google Scholar

Burkeman O., Why can’t the world’s greatest minds solve the mystery of consciousness?,   Google Scholar

January 2015,   Google Scholar

Chen J., Burgess P., The boundaries of legal personhood: how spontaneous intelligence   Google Scholar

can problematise differences between humans, artificial intelligence, companies and   Google Scholar

animals, 2019,   Google Scholar

Chopra S., Laurence F., White A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents, University of Michigan Press, 2011,   Google Scholar

Copeland B.J., Artificial intelligence (AI), 12 January 2017, https://www.britannica.   Google Scholar

com/technology/artificial-intelligence.   Google Scholar

Čerka P., Grigienė J., Sirbikytė G., Liability for damages caused by artificial intelligence, “Computer Law & Security Review” 2015, vol. 31(3),   Google Scholar

De Caria R., The Legal Meaning of Smart Contracts, “European Review of Private Law” 2019, no. 6,   Google Scholar

Dobbs D.B., The Law of Torts, Hornbook series Practitioner treatise series, West Group, 2001.   Google Scholar


Financial Stability Board, Artificial Intelligence and machine learning in financial services, 1 November 2017,   Google Scholar

Floridi L., Taddeo M., Turilli M., Turing’s imitation game: still an impossible challenge   Google Scholar

for all machines and some judges – an evaluation of the 2008 Loebner contest, “Minds   Google Scholar

and Machines” 2009, vol. 19(1),   Google Scholar

Giliker P., Vicarious Liability in Tort: A Comparative Perspective, “Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law” 2010,   Google Scholar

Gunning D., Aha D.W., DARPA’s Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Program, “AI Magazine” 2019, vol. 40(2),   Google Scholar

G20 Ministerial Statement on Trade and Digital Economy,   Google Scholar

doclib/docs/2019/june/tradoc_157920.pdf.   Google Scholar

Heric M., Goldman N., Corporate Legal Eagles Start to Embrace Artificial Intelligence,   Google Scholar

“Bain & Company Brief” 2019,   Google Scholar

d77cb0241 39a224cade94a1a00e/bain-brief_digital-in-legal.pdf.   Google Scholar

Hodge L., Law and technological change, British Irish Commercial Bar Association   Google Scholar

Signet Library, Edinburgh, Justice of The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom,   Google Scholar

April 2019,   Google Scholar

Hubbard F.P., Sophisticated Robots’: Balancing Liability, Regulation, and Innovation,   Google Scholar

“Florida Law Review” 2014, vol. 66(1803), ?article=2027&context=law_facpub.   Google Scholar

Janal R., Die deliktische Haftung beim Einsatz von Robotern – Lehren aus der Haftung   Google Scholar

für Sachen und Gehilfen, “Gless/Seelmann, Intelligente Agenten und das Recht”   Google Scholar

, vol. 141,   Google Scholar

Kosse D.D., Pravovyi rezhym ta mekhanizm pravovoho rehuliuvannia: oznaky ta spivvidnoshennia (Legal regime and mechanism of legal regulation: signs and correlations), “Derzhava i pravo” 2009, vyp. 44.   Google Scholar

Lea G., The Struggle To Define What Artificial Intelligence Actually Means, 3 September 2015.   Google Scholar

Lehmann-Wilzig S.N., Frankenstein Unbound – Towards a legal definition of Artificial ntelligence, “Futures” 1981, vol. 442,   Google Scholar

Lenardon J.P.A., The regulation of artificial intelligence, Tilburg University, Tilburg 2017,   Google Scholar

Leroux Ch., Labruto R., Boscarato Ch., Caroleo F., Günther J-P. et al., Suggestion For A Green Paper on Legal Issues in Robotics, Grant Agreement. Number: 248552, public report, December 2012,   Google Scholar

Opitz P., Civil Liability and Autonomous Robotic Machines: Approaches in the EU and US, “Stanford-Vienna TTLF Working Paper”, no. 43,,   Google Scholar

Pidruchnyk dlia studentiv yurydychnykh fakultetiv [Textbook for law students], 5-te vyd. pererob. ta dop. K.: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury, 2015.   Google Scholar

Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence, /artificial-intelligence/pdfs/oecd-recommendation-on-ai-en.pdf.   Google Scholar

Runciman D., How Democracy Ends, Profile Books Ltd., 2018.   Google Scholar

Smith A., Artificial intelligence, 2015,   Google Scholar

Susskind R., Susskind D., The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts, OUP 2015, 16,   Google Scholar

Urban T., The AI Revolution: The Road to Superintelligence, 22 January 2015,   Google Scholar

Veith Ch. et al., How Legal Technology Will Change the Business of Law, January 2016,   Google Scholar

Weaver J.F., Robots Are People Too: How Siri, Google Car, and Artificial Intelligence Will Force Us to Change Our Laws, 26 November 2013,   Google Scholar

Williams J., Stand out of our Light, Cambridge University Press, 2018,   Google Scholar

Wilks Y., Responsible Computers?, IJCAI’85: Proceedings of the 9th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence, August 1985, vol. 2.   Google Scholar



Cited By /

Martsenko, N. (2021). Influence of artificial intelligence on the legal system. Studia Prawnoustrojowe, (54).

Nataliia Martsenko 
Ternopil National Economic University