“Family – Politics – Globalization” Family intimacy

Maria Elena Garcia Jimenez

Pontifical John Paul II for Studies on Marriage and Family, Mexico (Mexico)


Abstract

Intimacy is a key component of relational bonds, associated not only with sex but with every aspect of what each member of a family expresses –in the way he or she can do so–. How does it take place? What are the existing approaches towards the family to weigh intimacy? How is intimacy construed, and how can it be widely understood? Intimacy is not static: it changes through time and is different throughout the family life cycle, as well as through the various stages of each of the family members. Why is intimacy relevant? Intimacy is a value, and its nature goes beyond what is often expected: it constructs or deconstructs the family. Because it is deeply connected to feelings, thoughts, beliefs, traditions, culture, working with intimacy in each member may lead to the armor-plating of the family. Now, the construction of each person as a human individual does not just happen; it requires time, techniques, love, respect, and intimacy, which directly leads to self-fidelity. In turn, self-fidelity in each member of the family can produce what is known as a family coat of arms. While broken intimacy can destroy a person’s self-esteem and, consequently, meaningful, long-lasting relationships, armor-plating intimacy can develop deeply enriched human individuals who bring who they are and what they possess to ultimately weave a strong society. As a result, a society that protects and fosters intimacy, not only pays attention to what damages exist and should be prevented, but to what makes people live in generous self-donation. Intimacy lets a person know his/her value; therefore, intimacy is the strongest value and technique to assess what we are, what we need, what we want.


Supporting Agencies

"Weryfikacja artykułu - finansowane ze środków Ministerstwa Edukacji i Nauki na podstawie umowy nr RCN/SP/0292/2021/1 z dnia 1.11.2022 r.; kwota środków finansowych stanowiących pomoc przyznaną w ramach programu „Rozwój czasopism naukowych” 19 610 zł."


Bauman Zygmunt, 2015, Vida líquida, Paidós, España   Google Scholar

Bowlby John, 1998, El apego y la pérdida: El apego. Tomo 1 de la Trilogía, Paidós, Barcelona   Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner Urie, 1987, La ecología del desarrollo humano: experimentos en entornos naturales y diseñados, trad. Alejandra Devoto, Paidós, España   Google Scholar

Erikson Erik H., 1950, Childhood and Society, W. W. Norton & Co, United States of America   Google Scholar

Estrada Inda Lauro, 2014, El Ciclo Vital de la Familia, Penguin Random House, México, p. 75   Google Scholar

Foley Megan K. & Duck Steve, 2006, “That Dear Octopus”: A Family-Based Model of Intimacy, in: Turner Lynn H. & West Richard (eds), The family communication sourcebook, Sage Publications, Inc., p. 183–199 [online], access: 03.07.2022, .
Crossref   Google Scholar

Gottman John & Silver Nan, 2013, What makes love last? How to Build Trust and Avoid Betrayal, Simon & Schuster, United States of America, p. 167   Google Scholar

Hirschberger, Florian, & Mikulincer, 2003, Intimacy is a term that, despite its widespread use, remains relatively ambiguous. P. 676   Google Scholar

Isaacs Jones David, 2015, La educación de las virtudes humanas y su evaluación, EUNSA Ediciones Universidad de Navarra, España   Google Scholar

Marrone Mario, 2001, La Teoría del Apego. Un enfoque actual, Psimática [online], access: 03.07.2022, .   Google Scholar

Watzlawick P., Beavin Bavelas J., Jackson D.D., 1967, Pragmatics of Human Communication A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes, Norton & Co Inc., New York, 1967.   Google Scholar

Download


Published
2022-11-25

Cited by

Garcia Jimenez, M. E. (2022). “Family – Politics – Globalization” Family intimacy. Forum Teologiczne, 23, 105–113. https://doi.org/10.31648/ft.8007

Maria Elena Garcia Jimenez 
Pontifical John Paul II for Studies on Marriage and Family, Mexico (Mexico)