Jak mówić o kryzysie ekologicznym, aby anthropoi chcieli z nim faktycznie walczyć?

Magdalena Hoły-Łuczaj

doi:10.31648/hip.2640

Published: 2018-12-211

No. 24 (2018)

Jak mówić o kryzysie ekologicznym, aby anthropoi chcieli z nim faktycznie walczyć?

Magdalena Hoły-Łuczaj

Humanities and Natural Sciences

Section: Varia – Symposium

https://doi.org/10.31648/hip.2640

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Magdalena Hoły-Łuczaj, Postnatural Environmentalism – Ethical Emancipation of Artifacts in Environmental Philosophy , Humanities and Natural Sciences: No. 23 (2017)
Magdalena Hoły-Łuczaj, "Peculiar Sameness of Physis and Techne" - Heidegger and the Problem of Artifact in Eco-Philosophy , Humanities and Natural Sciences: No. 20 (2014)

Download files

pdf (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Hoły-Łuczaj, M. (2018). Jak mówić o kryzysie ekologicznym, aby anthropoi chcieli z nim faktycznie walczyć?. Humanities and Natural Sciences, (24), 591–598. https://doi.org/10.31648/hip.2640

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

Benyus J. (2002), Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature, Harper Perennial, New York.

Bińczyk E. (2018), Epoka człowieka. Retoryka i marazm antropocenu, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

Blok V. (2017), Earthing Technology: Towards an Eco-centric Concept of Biomimetic Technologies in the Anthropocene, „Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology” 21(2–3): 127–49, doi: 10.5840/techne201752363.

Carter A. (1995), Deep Ecology or Social Ecology, „The Heythrop Journal” 36 (3): 328-350, doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.1995.tb00992.x.

Hoły-Łuczaj, M. (2018), In Search of Allies for Postnatural Environmentalism, or Revisiting an Ecophilosophical Reading of Heidegger, w druku w „Environmental Values”.

Hoły-Łuczaj, M., Blok V. (2019), How to Deal with Hybrids in the Anthropocene? Towards a Philosophy of Technology and Environmental Philosophy 2.0, w druku w „Environmental Values”.

Johnson E.R. (2016), Reconsidering Mimesis: Freedom and Acquiescence in the Anthropocene, „South Atlantic Quarterly” 115 (2): 267–289, doi.org/10.1215/00382876-3488409. Google Scholar